Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'antietam'.
-
I need some help on Antietam as the CSA. I've played and lost it three times in a row now on the hard difficulty after trying a few different strategies. I'm afraid I've mismanaged my army beforehand and I'm screwed, but I'd like to hear from some other people how they win at Antietam. I know I could pull back to Sharpsburg and play for the draw (easily) but I like winning. Attached is my army composition after Cedar Mountain and prior to the major battle itself. I've got one career point to burn which I plan to use on logistics because I inevitably run out of ammo by the third phase of the battle. The last couple attempts I've bought rifles for all my remaining musket units, then used those extra muskets to equip new brigades. I still run out of guns before I run out of money. Last attempt the scaling put me at 40k vs 90k. Even though I get units racking up anywhere from 1000 to 4000 kills in the course of the battle, I can't hold off the AI's numbers in the last phase. My second corps only has a couple mounted skirmishers and one infantry brigade in it. For the record, I've got 100plus hours in this game and I've watched/read the guides and the FAQ so I'm not a total noob.
-
Hi everyone I have a problem, I'm playing as Union an in the last few battles since 2nd bull run, I'm facing high casualties on my side. I have higher casualties than my enemy, but still won the battles. In the last battle (Antietam) i lost nearly 40% of my troops (32000 casualties),the enemy lost only 23000 units. Winning the battle gives you only 23000 manpower. So I have a problem refilling my brigades. Is this intended? Less manpower towards the end of the campaign? And what do i do wrong that the enemy has so much less casualties than me? Also i have a high medicine stat (6 or 7) and politics (4). Thanks for the help regards memoric
- 22 replies
-
- casualties
- too
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
PBS recently released a video on YouTube called, My Brother's Keeper. It is the story of two brother's at Antietam, and, of course, on opposite sides. It offers the option to watch in 3D with a Cardboard, or other such 3D Apparatus. Fortunately, I have such a Google Cardboard at the house, so I was able to watch it as intended. I very highly recommend it. Nearly felt like I was back on the field myself.
-
Hello all, I am curious as to what seems to be the community experience with victory and defeat and what seems to be the catalyst in each scenario. It seems like it might be somewhat arbitrary. I played the Union campaign first. I found Shiloh unbeatable, but it was due to not realizing that Army Organization needed to be maxed as much as possible - I had assumed until that point that like First Bull Run, my corps would make up just a part of the army. When I restarted, and put points towards organization and went to Shiloh with two small corps, I was able to win. From then on, despite what I considered close calls, I did not lose a battle. By the time I reached Antietam, I had eight divisions in three corps and by the end of the battle was able to completely rout the Confederate Army. I did the same for the Confederate campaign, but found by the time I reached Antietam I had clearly not done as well in minimizing casualties, as I had only six divisions in the three corps. I hoped this would be adequate (especially since while I had fewer divisions than historically, I did have more total men (41k vs 38k, and the North had slightly fewer (81k vs 87k). In the battle, I did not even attempt to hold Nicodemus Hill, and was forced to abandon Dunker Church because I was being flanked as long as I held it. You can see from the final results of the battle in the attached screenshot I held all other objectives and inflicted just shy of twice as many casualties as I sustained. So, I was surprised when I was defeated. I could have at least understood a draw. So it would seem that my failure to hold Dunker Church caused me to be defeated. What would have happened had I held it? A draw or a victory? Holding three out of four of the strategic points on the final map would, in my view, count as a victory taken with the lopsided casualty count, but even if it did not, should it not then be a draw rather than outright defeat? Has anyone else experienced this? I welcome other thoughts.