Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

NorthernWolves

Tester
  • Posts

    1,032
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by NorthernWolves

  1. What GPU/CPU/MB combo would be an example of this 'bleeding edge hardware'? Is an $800 ready-to-play tower from Newegg with a 2013-14 model GPU with 3GB, a 3.5 to 4.0 GHZ processor, a 1TB HD and 8GB ram considered bleeding edge? That was just my first quick google search, one could find an even better deal than that. In this market analysis you cited, would that be a bleeding edge rig? I'm asking for real, not being combative, I haven't read the market analysis, do you have a source? I don't expect a game that pushes my system to the limit, but I get tired of hearing the concerns of people with rigs that can't even run DirectX 11 and who get 20 FPS on other recent PC titles. And I certainly don't think they need to be catered to in late 2014. The person who can't afford a decent PC in 2014 is going to whine about the DLC that they will want to sell in 2015.
  2. The smoke doesn't look bad, but it leaves a lot to be desired. I've always wondered why do the people in the cheap seats get to dictate how the band plays? It's 2014, why do the tastes, desires and opinions of the considerable number of us who have invested in a decent computer always have to take a backseat to people who are concerned with FPS? This happens on every PC game, this isn't new with Naval Action. You can get a really good gaming computer for 1/3 the price it cost in 2009. You can now get a great GPU for about $200. If you're a gamer who spends more than 4 hours a week on any game, you can afford to get yourself a good rig. This is a frustration that has been building for a couple of years now and it is not directed at anyone on Naval Action forums, I was just hoping to not run into the ever present FPS chasers. And then those of us who want realistic smoke get caricatured as people who want a smoke simulator...nice.
×
×
  • Create New...