Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Captain White

Ensign
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Captain White's Achievements

Landsmen

Landsmen (1/13)

0

Reputation

  1. Привет, Серьезно? Я думал PotBS умер, ну или на грани. А тут что? Никого? Я скачаю PotBS - зайду, гляну, что да как
  2. Привет Сандаль, А сам ты за кого воюешь? Северный флот?
  3. Он самый, время идет, а он все такой же )
  4. Всем привет, Раньше зависал в PotBS и вот думаю вернуться в эту игрушку, но хотел бы играть вмест с товарищами из PotBS. Ленин, Ферд , Пайгелда, Фуба, Сандаль, Яс, Рей - ОТЗОВИТЕСЬ! Я ходил под ником - Philip White (Филька Вайт) Кто за кого играет? Все за Российскую Империю?
  5. Hey guys, I was just wondering if there will be a wipe a all? Is there a date?
  6. Well, one more thing - I'm not against the amount of available ships, I'm against that ships with same requirements to sail - crew amount (level in other games) are not competetive enough between each other. Like we can increase Frigates speed or turn rate, or both, because it has less planking (armor). And Prater, now I'm sailing Frigate and kinda like it, never sailed a BP, but why would you choose Frigate over BP? Just curious
  7. Prate, have you played Pirates of the Burning Sea? If not - I would say there were a lot of ships for top level, but there was a meta for port battles, 6v6 groups, ganks - well ganks had biggest variable, but in the end for successful fight you should go for the best choice by attributes. High skill could be a game changer in a 1v1 or small groups, not PBs or big groups.
  8. Well mostly because they were made by different shipyards/masters/countries. Mostly they were made because countries had to compete in their naval craftsmanship, while we compete mostly in skill level. And why do you more ships, when they won't be used most of the time? Damn in IE I can't even quote someone. This one goes to Prater
  9. Hi everyone, So I've been playing Naval Action OW for some time and mostly I like the game, but there are some things that are really annoying and one of them is the reason I'm writing this topic. My topic is based on table made by Inigo Balboa.(Sorry, not able to the copy link for the table, at work we have Internet Explorer. It's located in Guides-> A short guide for novices) Attribute difference between ships. Lets have a look on ships with the same crew amount - NavyBrig&Mercury, Renomee&Surprise, Frigate&Belle Poule. Which one are you going to choose Navy Brig or Mercury? Well I'm sure it's going to be Mercury. So Mercury has advantage in all attributes and has more guns per broadside, while Navy Brig has 2 front guns. I mean why he needs them? 2nd group Renomee&Surprise, well balance attempt was made. Renomee has sailing advantage and stern armor is increased, but have a look on fire power. Surprise has 25 batteries (19 per broadside), Renomee - 17 (15 per broadside), and Surprise lower deck caliber - 5-9/5-8, Renomee 6-9/7-8. And the last group, that really upsets me, because I like how Frigate looks. Well they have similar sailing attributes, but BP has higher armor values, well and a little bit more fire power. The other thing Frigate has front guns, but BP has back guns. I mean is it that huge difference front or back guns, that you need to make a separste ship for it? Making modules would be much more efficient and left you with more fitting options. I mean installing front gun module or remove it, and you get some advantages or disadvantages with them. So I would like to hear your option on that matter and maybe explain me why ships like Frigate or Navy Brig exist. Sorry for the long post
  10. I think we need something bad ass, like Hercules Master Craft from PotBS and I think Wasa or USS Independence are the best choices!
  11. Really? I didn't receive any e-mail with activation code! Can someone explain me that?
×
×
  • Create New...