-
Posts
698 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by D. Federico de Gravina y N
-
-
I hope to see dynamic fire such as this video from a "rival" game
It isn´t a rival game, they made a different mode of sea battles, and i like it
-
-
Erm...nope. I didn't say that either. I just stated that the French had both a more prominent role, and a stronger commitment to it. It was the foreign power that most supported the american independence. It also was the nation which most money spent on the effort (which ended up in the economic problem that ended up with the french revolution).
That doesn't mean that the Spanish role was of little significance as the support was important indeed and made a difference. It just means that Spain played a lesser -direct- role than France did in the independence of the colonies, as military speaking they were more worried in regaining what was lost in the 7 year war than in actively supporting the american revolution. French military commitment towards the actual independence of the USA was much more direct (and costly. And unrewarding).
chato, que soy español. No es cosa de hacernos quedar mal, o de minimizar nuestra contribución. Pero las cosas como son...los gabachos se metieron hasta el pescuezo, y en el conflicto en si. Nosotros fuimos a lo nuestro, en lo que es el esfuerzo militar de la independencia americana nos mojamos bien poquito...y bien hecho que estuvo y bien que nos fue, que es una de las pocas veces que las decisiones estrategicas globales de una guerra en España fueron tomadas con un poquito de inteligencia en lugar de con un exceso de pelotas .
JAJAJAJ, Ok es cierto que los gabachos se lo curraron más, pero no debemos menospreciar el papel del Gobernador Bernando de Gálvez, y e apoyo clandestino a los americanos por medio de avituallamiento, así como la ayuda en la toma de Pensacola, y Saratoga. Es bueno saber que hay españoles por aquí, empezaba a preocuparme la superioridad británica en este foro
JAJAJAJ , Ok it is true that the French worked more , but we should not underestimate the role of Governor Bernardo de Galvez , and will support the American underground through supplies, as well as help in the conquest of Pensacola, and Saratoga. Good to know that there are Spanish here, beginning to worry the British superiority in this forum
-
True enough, but french involvement and commitment was by far the most important...
Really you believe that the role of Spain in the American Revolution was superficial?
-
BTW, France after all helped the US to be independent in the first place, so in this particular era they should be your second choice after USA!!!.
And Spain and Holland too, don't forget it
-
the sound is amazing!!!!!!!
- 1
-
Well, now we know it will be released Thursday
it´s your opinion or it´s a confirmated information??
-
Spain
Real Compañía de la Habana(1740) Tobacco.
Real Compañía de Comercio de Barcelona.Real Compañía Guipuzcoana de Caracas(1728). -
The problem with the spanish crews, is that the ships were bad preparated for the battle, because the spanish monarchy almost no money invested in Spanish navy; this and in these moment the crews of the ships, did´t had enough people, it´s the consequence about the poor time reload
More or less
-
Rageboarding will be impossible in Naval Action. To board a first rate successfully you will need a line ship with a sufficient crew.
Or be Jack Sparrow and Will Turner
-
-
I´m pilot in a online squadron, so I 'm used to doing missions 3 hours
-
Ok.
A Stupid question:
Do you have raised that the cannons back off when they are fired?
or it´s a hard hit for the FPS??
-
I have a GTX 560 ti, so i´m hoping the same than OTMatt
-
I have seen that the minimal graphics card requirements for this game are Nvidia gtx 560, and the recommended are Nvidia Gtx 760.
I want to know if this is true, because in other games like Crysis 3, the recommended graphics card requirements are Nvidia Gtx 560, and Crysis is "hard" game, so why for this game the requirements are more?
- 2
-
Well, if the date is tomorrow, less fo 24 hours to the epic moment!!!
-
But who has said that 21st it´s the date????
-
I think he means that we may have to match certain requirements to sail certain ships.
Means if you want to sail a 1st rate you better have the skill to do so.
If you ask me this is a good idea to somehow teach the players a ship bevore they sail it and have no clue about it. (what a sentence)
i liked this idea
-
were just thinking about it..
in testing rounds and in large scale operations could be a useful feature.. But it could have some design issues with not being able to sail certain ships. (for example you are a Leutenant and 3rd rate could be sailed only by an Admiral) or if you have not passed ship of the line commandeering exams.
Excuse me!!!!??????
-
I like the idea for have some periods to not mix ships from differents times
-
What happens with the policy of the faccions???, we always going to be in war??? there will be periods of peace between two or more faccions??
-
you can do this simply by pressing spacebar
But the ship shoot since bow to aft??
-
Sorry.
I wanted to sugges to shoot all the guns but one by one.
-
nice date.. but hard to achieve.. maybe for sea trials, but again we don't promise it.
We want to bring open world to the EA and some other nice features, and they are still not ready for testing.
Sea trials will have boarding and mortars and 2 more ships (Brig and snow).
So i have to wait one month,no?
New ETA?
in Patch Feedback and General discussions
Posted
another joke??????