Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

MrStan53

Members2
  • Content Count

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

40 Excellent

About MrStan53

  • Rank
    Landsmen
  • Birthday August 21

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Pacific Northwest

Recent Profile Visitors

193 profile views
  1. This song has no relevance to anything at all. Nope, nothing at all.
  2. true, but I still imagine the profit margins would be far greater given more positive coverage of the game. I'm not on the board but it just seems like from the POV of some guy (whos dad has a degree in Biz Econ trust me he also works at Nintendo) that the simple presence of the game on Steam would draw in new players, potential advertising, and would satiate the current playerbase. They already have Naval Action which sold undoubtedly a lot of copies and unless it applies for every individual title I doubt they would have 30% lower revenue from that. Then again I'm no analyst just some guy on
  3. They really should just release it on steam as soon as possible, and open it to the workshop as well.
  4. I don't think anyone really has rose tinted glasses at this point, to be frank. If this update doesn't come out today or tomorrow I wouldn't be surprised if some of us start demanding refunds.
  5. I'm glad someone else noticed this. We have an entire unfinished ship class (light cruisers), the entire dreadnought generation being half baked, and it's not even a complete update. Instead we're getting more WW2 and post WW2 Battleship and Super Battleship hulls with like 5 hulls total split between DDs, TBs, and CLs, and this still isn't even a core patch. Also, this isn't even assuming that these hulls won't reuse assets from the Cruisers Trento or Deutschland
  6. Can we get *any* CL superstructures? Every 20s and later CL at the moment looks essentially like either a bigger destroyer or the Trento.
  7. Why does it have to be about ideology at all? I mean I am on the left yet you won’t see me talking about Noam Chomsky and tying it into the discussion in one way or another. It’s about the fact that we’re here to discuss this game as well as to a lesser extent naval history, and that this just isn’t the place to grandstand people for political reasons regardless of your own. If anyone wanted to discuss politics then they should take it elsewhere like a classroom, library, or debate club not a video game forum.
  8. Amen brother. If the devs simply communicated better and were more transparent about setbacks and what not I swear 65% of our issues would be fixed, perhaps not on the game side itself but instead this wouldn't be starting to feel downright fishy. I bought this game on the presumption I'd get more than a sandbox of prefabs, but it's been almost a year since I bought it and the only thing that's seemingly progressed is the number of prefabs and introduction of new bugs. My childlike wonder for this game has basically diminished because of that. Perhaps the devs should just be blunt and say t
  9. This isn't /his/ or /pol/. This is a forum where we discuss and give feedback on an in-development video game title, discussing gameplay and shooting ideas to make a fun and balanced experience worth buying. If you want to talk about how great German tech was and make it about politics then I'd suggest going to one of those places and keep it off of here.
  10. Absolutely this, it's not even controversial to say that German naval technology was horribly obsolete by the second world war. Frankly it's not even Germany's fault their designs were outdated either. After the first world war, most modern German warships were taken as war prizes and the Germans were simply unable to test their existing building practices and schematics. Contrast this with the allies who, after being forced to scrap vast portions of their navy, often shot their own hulks (and the captured German ones) to pieces to see how they would fare, as well as stresstesting their existi
  11. I think the game works naturally on Imperial, and converts it to metric, so this ends up being uneven due to rounding. I'm a burgerstani though so I've never really played it on metric unless I was trying to do a historical ship
  12. Yeah I think the US in general needs an update, as generally speaking all of the Dreadnought and onwards hulls are the Generic ones or are the Iowa or South Carolina (I'd like to build a Standard Battleship, a North Carolina, or a Salem please!). Still I'm happy to see it seems hulls are otherwise most of the way there for now and I'm happy too see things are still coming along. I haven't ran into any issues yet personally too 🙂 Edit: I was happy to see a new US fore tower and rear tower for late game! Though I was hoping for a few more, this is great! Tanku Devs ❤️.
  13. this is one of the times the devs should pop in and explain what's going on, but I guess we just gotta keep waiting *sigh*
  14. AFAIK Radio is basically unused, save for RDF. I think it has to do with the campaign and radioing command and ships outside of your sector. Other than adding (far too much) weight it's useless. The one caveat mentioned earlier is RDF does give you the radar effect of pointing out enemy ships an arrow like Gen 1+2 Radar does, making it a useful, beit underpowered stopgap from the time it's invented to the late 20s, however still it only gives the effect and not so much any targeting or spotting bonus
×
×
  • Create New...