Goal
-
Posts
12 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by Goal
-
-
27 minutes ago, Rayo said:
That´s a lie and you now it...repeating it won´t make it true. Devs said that it was unlikely that a bug occur. I find a little bit questionable that a clan diplomat is so eager to lie like that.
You should be ashamed about the words you directed towards SKULL, insulting and mocking us, for "abuse a bug". The hostility was open, many other nations arrived there to do the same and in the end it was a game failure...We did the right thing (as well as other nations) wich is attacking a neutral port. But having your port back it´s not enough for you... you have to blame us and dedicate some offenses to us... disgusting, but not a surprise I guess
So one last time, get it trough your head, beacuse we are getting tired of hearing this bs from you...We are not to blame. Devs are. We used a game mechanic that wasn´t an acknowledged bug at that time and did what we are suppoused to. I think it´s not so difficult to understand.
look at the post in Hotfixes this week - 12th Februaryon page 6"replied in support.. If it is a bug port will be reverted. dont worry. "
so i think, i did not lie about that
-
34 minutes ago, Maloco said:
You accuse us of using a bug.
The Navasse appeared as capturable, the developers were giving confusing news that it could be that because of sabotage. So yes, there were the conquest missions for La Navasse available and we went for his capture. It wasn't until long after capturing the port that developers confirmed it was a server bug.
But we had already captured it ... where do you see the abuse of a bug?By the way, I will not deny you that we loved to take the Navasse in your nose.
you are right! the term "bug-using" was maybe wrong....im still a bit angry about the lost weekend-sleep.
we had some losses too, but thats own risk to do hostility-missions!
-
finally one Thread open for this: (i did not want to spam the support with a new one)
@Devs: thank you for solving this Problem with Navasse and for all the work you put in here
@all who feel injured that we got our port back: Ink allready wrote on Saturday, before the Hostility was open, that we will get it back if there is a bug, so you were not forced to show up 3 o'clock (for me) in the middle of the night. Live would not have changed for you! So you want reward for bug-using?
-
1
-
-
15 minutes ago, SparkyTheParasite said:
ì would like to have a investigation log. and also investigation restriction. so that only officers can invest into points. and can see who did invest in what bonus.
thats a good idea for suggestion-thread
-
4 minutes ago, Lyn22 said:
It has not been captured
Lyn, its about our Clanwarehouse
-
no, cwh is in our own nation port captured by our clan
-
there is shure more reals in warehouse than needed to maintain navasse! and i dont know how to sabotage the server
-
so i ask for a rollback here! its not fair to lose a good port to a bug!
-
If the money comes from clanwarehouse, it shure is not our problem
-
Somehow our port la navasse turned neutral after today's maintanence-break! There was no warning and no defencebattle, we want our port back! i allready made a F11, but did not get any answer yet, so i post it here as well
-
3
-
La navasse
in Support
Posted
i have not missed the word "if", and that was before the hostility, so it was not a lie! and fighting this hostility is your right, but your own risk in that unclear state....and compensations.....is atwoods not enough?