Llewellyn Jones RN
-
Posts
401 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by Llewellyn Jones RN
-
-
While I agree with what has been said above we at GA do have a dislike for VCO well actually certain members the personal attacks by unnamed members about our character within the British nation forced GA to take a step back from the RVR especially shortly before the map reset when were lucky to have max three online. We have since had a resurgence of members allowing us to renter the fray thus being at port defences and several attacks (carta, and Nippes) while we currently do not openly engage in open world pvp we do sally forth against regular forays by pirates in our area of ports. Right now we have stopped our expansionist operations having secured hose ports we think are in our realm of operation.
what this means for the future you might see more of us on the open sea we have a good group but our prime time tends to be Euro into US as GA has a mixed base of players rather than all one area of influence. Like port battles at 02;39 server time basically rules 60% of the clan out of action including me but of course this is US prime time and we are on a Global server so to be expected and we understand that.
We at GA are classed as carebears by V(shame)CO but unfortunately our shame enemies really never understood the whys a wherefores of GA stepping back now they have moved we are slowly but cautiously stepping out into the world even to the extent of suicidal defences of ports like Peurto Escondido where we knew what we were facing but went in anyways carebears would have left the port undefended and walked away.
-
I like this alot i propsed a idea a while ago that would have seen wars declared by a random generated algorythum but that fel on def ears.
-
1 hour ago, Teutonic said:
VCO and TF came down to defend it. They defended the region by holding the port. I didn't see you around, in fact TF and VCO stayed and fought to death, the rest of you guys ran when you could in the battle or hid in ports. I won't deny it was a slaughter in the end, but you throwing blame around to folks who decided to take time away from where they base to go defend it it hilarious.
Don't blame the loss on VCO and TF - because you in fact didn't lose the port you seem to care so much about.
Also its not that I wasn't in that battle because i was in my Bed but Fortunatas was using my Agga and i had hull repairs and rum available for Brits to use in the port for a small fee
-
10 minutes ago, Christendom said:
Welp, so much for 1 full day of national unity.
VCO showed up to defend your region that you and your clan refuses to abandon knowing full well we cannot hold it indefinitely. VCO showed up and dropped 6 aggies defending your little PVE wonderland when all your clan could muster was 1 person. We didn't receive so much as a thanks or a single offer to replace the ships that were lost. Now you have the stones to bad mouth us on the forums here?
Screw that. I've made attempts to mend fences inside the brit nation, in particular a couple hours last night agreeing to defend ports outside of the best interest of the nation to pacify clans that do not contribute.
Cartagena will no longer be protected by VCO, have at it pirates and french.
Cartagena was never defended by VCO you came to the one port battle and got trapped by the French losing 6 ships because your home base is so far from the front lines it takes an age to get to Cartagena now you know why we didnt show in the Gulf
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Tenet said:
My responses in purple:
Great Britain had a over month to build up, with a capital that spawns trade resources that can be bought on contract(a huge money maker, and advantage Mortimer lacks), ( blockaded by pirates ) - Dutch made it in just fine, with enough efficiency to account for the occasional losses. You had a home port to fight from to defend trade, and it only needs to be done in immediate vicinity.
and trade ships running into Willemstad 24/7 with cover from the Dutch,(nothing stopping pirates with alt accounts from doing the same) - None of your main trade goods had a buy contract in the first month of play, you left your trade undefended both in shop and in the OW. I know because I sailed in and bought it several times, with the biggest threat being your own uneducated rookies tagging in basics and brigs. CKA were a positive exception.
with easy ability to teleport.(removed from the game 1 week now) - Tow-to-Port can be easily used to enter Willemstad or KPR from 60-120 k away using "closest deep water port" and trade tool distance indicator. It was "fixed" in 10.4, only recently, and can still be used to dodge freeport hunt areas once or twice per day.
I can't respond to the rest, because it simply proves my point - resources tied up with inactive players means you didn't share your wealth, exactly what I claimed.
i just looked in KPR and three basic things are not available in port to build ships so dont give me that bull crap
-
1
-
-
good work Sir
-
33 minutes ago, Tenet said:
Great Britain had a over month to build up, with a capital that spawns trade resources that can be bought on contract(a huge money maker, and advantage Mortimer lacks), ( blockaded by pirates )
and trade ships running into Willemstad 24/7 with cover from the Dutch,(nothing stopping pirates with alt accounts from doing the same)
with easy ability to teleport.(removed from the game 1 week now)
Where are those dozens of millions of trade profits?(tied up in resources probably and in inactive accounts now)
Where were the PvP guards to ensure the ships don't get intercepted? (busy trying to grind levels on unwanted ships)
Where are all the 1st and 4th rates? (tied up with in active players)
Not only that, but you had VCO and TF join the nation - growing even bigger. (it was VCO, TF and AUSEZ that attacked the gulf because they didnt have any marks from the conquest before they moved)
VCO have done nothing but moan about the British nation being carebears and not helping in the north when some of us did not even want to fight the americans
-
1
-
-
its not about stopping them from having the ability to march cross country but more about fatigue.
-
22 hours ago, The Soldier said:
Something tells me someone's been playing a bit of Steel Division recently to make this suggestion.
No actually a old hand at 'Scourge of war Gettysburg' a game where fatigue made alot of difference to how you fought the game tired troops arriving on the field of battle would be exhausted sooner therefore they would not be able to fight an peek effiency if a game that old can have it coded in then i am sure this one could with real good effects as it is your troops only get tired when you double time the them. Can you imaging how tiring it would to cross a river that has boggy ground either side then have to march into battle without a rest.
-
1
-
-
22 minutes ago, Grundgemunkey said:
think im going to global server ... mainly because i refuse to be dictated to when and when i cannot play by the likes of kloothommel although i live in uk .. eu primetime is not always my primetime ..i have a life away from NA and.i don't see why i should have to give up time with my family because some players only want to play at certain times,,, and seem intent on forcing that on other players ...
i will give it a month before the servers are merged back to global anyway
me too
-
On 22/03/2017 at 9:48 AM, Guear said:
Any evidences? Maybe one at least? About who and how long used it.
So far it turns out that he used a bug and opened it to the entire English-speaking community. Patch meanwhile was only a day after the video was published.
i hope you got a warning for this because i got one for calling out that the danes had been using this very bug long before we even learnt of it.
i know for a fact it was not LV that discovered the bug but another player who has an friend who plays Danes who passed the info on now LV did the right thing and made it available to all A by making a video and then telling everyone about including the devs then devs proceeded to fix the bug within 48 hours. as of 19 April it will be irrelivent so get over it and carry on!
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, rediii said:
I can't take you serious sorry.
Reason why people are logging out in front of portbattles? Because 5vs25 is possible and happens too many times. Result is a boring fight and going offline after nothing happened instead of a nice battle
OW PvP is nice and all but there is no reason to sail most of the time. Mostly you need hours until you find a fight - if you even find a fight. (A fight -no gank) so portbattles are just a way to get a fast balanced battle.
Flags were nice wenn used in a proper way and not setting portbattletimers to stupid times. Fakeflags were cancer, yea
Redii to my understanding and for a good length of time the British nation has always sailed from a starting point be that Bridgetown, La Mona or KPR to port battles it is the Eastern alliance that is dishonourable and try's to log out outside of port every time the last time the BRITS did it was at Trinidad and that was for 10 mins because we made better time than expected. I for one am totally against logging out in front of port because it's cheating. Maybe we should have lowered ourselves to your level to get into the ports we night flipped but no we sailed there every time just as well after the next patch and the Devs fix it you won't be able to do it but then they are going to fix the BR difference so you won't be able to tag a PB fleet in unless you have a similar sized force to match the BR of the attacking fleet.
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, Bearwall said:
We're already fighting players who don't have a clue - why do you think I refer to the western alliance as no-skills? - And why do you think y'all ended up resorting to nightflips to a degree where the devs had no choice but to take a course of action I doubt they actually wanted - just to save the game from you guys..
Then join us in battle don't sit hiding in port and tagging us into screening battle bring your whole fleet and let's see who wins and who can claim to victory!
-
Just now, Le Vulture said:
Seriously guys ? could be adult please ? we are here for a same thing naah ? Naval Action ? so please stop sending your troll video, its our choice and we will not change our mind sorry so stop showing your bad things to others ! Please respect our choices thank you @Coraline Vodka @Christendom
we are glad you are going the only ones dashing the salt here is the french
-
39 minutes ago, PIerrick de Badas said:
Europeans will join the european server. Maybe not the ones that want to stay with the iwin nation witout ennemy but all the news ones that will comes ingame will join probably europe to avoid nightlfip too...
really IWIN nation who is going to iwin nation now because your alliances will not ballance out and you will be fighting generally players that dont have a clue or there are no players to fight you good luck with that and take you revolutionary brown french arse and run away.
-
4 hours ago, Anolytic said:
We have some very dedicated captains in our fleet, that are willing to stay up nights and to defend in hopes that their friends will not get too frustrated with the game and stop playing. Still we've lost Morgan's Bluff, Remidos, Islamorada, Gasparilla to night-flips recently, and we've defended even more than that.
Cumana, Puerto de Espana. Les Cayes was boycotted few weeks ago, but some french clans + me decided to defy the decision and put up a suicide 22 player defence that kept turned away 25 attackers.
i asked by the BRITS not the Americans Puerto de Espania was not night flipped yes it was late but the port battle started before 10pm my time so dont give me that crap its a night flip the Swedes had plenty of time to come counter us but failed and we all know it takes very little time to flip a port now if you do it right. yes several attempts at Les Cayes could have been stopped by you too if you were not sitting on your backside watching Russian porn the last three late flips i have been involved have been conducted by twelve players. I too want content and very often dont get it because this server is very EU centric even now. Alls it would have taken to defend any of those flips would have been 10-12 hardy players to come find us but you just want the i win option again.
-
14 minutes ago, PIerrick de Badas said:
We decide to boycot nightlip starting with castring untill devs give us this holly decision to make a second server . Then it boost our morale and we're back to defend again but it's just a time and a moral burst that help us, not our ability to have 25 nightplayer on purpose
Bollocks you defended every time! There was no boycott
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, Anolytic said:
Under the circumstances developers made the right decision. The alternative was that the Eastern alliance players would keep leaving the game because any gains and victories were nullified, or attempted to be nullified, but night-flips. Any strategic port we captured we could not expect to hold because of night-flips. Any regional bonuses we take or defend could be taken from us defenceless at any time unless 25 of us decided to sacrifice sleep on the same night. They are just pixels, but they are the pixels that allow us to build competitive ships. They are the pixels that give meaning to conquest. And they are the pixels that sustain already underpopulated and outmanned nations.
So which night flip have you not been able to defend I ask you not one that the BRITS have raised! Well not recently anyways.
-
21 minutes ago, PIerrick de Badas said:
My conclusion are not the same.
I not complain to awake up to make a port battle.
I complain for all the time when i can't awake up and that port are lost because we can't defend it. Defending a port is a choice when you are present. When you are not present it's because you didn't have the choice and it's when we complain. Loosing port we are not defending because of the nightlfips is the prolem not the ones we are able to defend
You see to have been able to defend them up till now ok it is we that are struggling to get the numbers to get a full fleet let alone a decent amount of screeners to these port battles so I call poppycock on your night flips! Yet again.
-
@devs are you all freaking drunk or something?
-
3
-
-
Oh wow it's going to get busy now
-
I never even bothered with looking at my rank I suspect the dev probably reordered things and the amount of posts required per rank hence the change in your rank now.
-
Actually you are a little wrong ZERG was created by clan leaders from several clans who wanted a bit more from the rvr element of the game. BRITS, KIN, SLRN can't remember with myself, Hatchi, Redman, General Pas, Bobzillah, Augustus to name a few of those initial and leading members.
-
Happy Christmas to you all!
Prime Times and Numbers
in Caribbean News
Posted
i remember VCO calling us out for not coming to help you in American waters even though Fortunatis and i were both there grinding the fleets with you. GA is not witch hunting Red we have had some words but most of it stems from your arrangements with them which to all of us when you switched looked like a clan in your pocket. I personally have no problem with Cheshire Cat but do dislike his stance on the Americans. SLRN members called Hardy out for having to log out after playing for 12 hours straight i think he deserved the rest unfortunatly it cost SLRN some ships up until then there had been no problems. I should know i started life with SLRN and am still a forum Admin on the Sealords Virtual Fleets forums. up until recently SLRN were playing on the EU server not this one thought there are a couple that still play now and again.
With regards to the personal attacks to one so young i cant condone it but i dare say there was a reason which might have been why but its not right that i agree with.
To be honest Christendom 1st and foremost were are not a PvP clan never have been but when people call us out for not doing stuff that wrankles and causes bad feelings so our passionate clan leaders Hardy and Dibella find that untenable and respond in kind maybe not the best way to go about things and words get said in the heat of the moment.