Captain2Strong

see you in 10 years

GB is still in charge of a lot of ports!!!

yep, just watch the game turn into shit! that's what Im doing!

ok

good idea it's going to match what's going on here!

disgusting outlaw scum must die! Captain 2Strong would be glad to help with this kind of task I will consider that GB is the best nation

the gaem does not work fix the gaem

WTF? they gave you 40% of the middle bar hp??? why wasn't it 0% like in my case???

considering that this requirement is important: GB is a good option! otherwise maybe RU, there's not much more to pick if this requirement is important for you, especially if you want to do offensive PBs

noone should question my infinite wisdom!!!

https://tenor.com/view/minionslol-gif-4519855

diana doesn't exist

reported.

OMG BRITISH GANKERS ARE KILLING THE GAME

it should be included in the base price, attacking someone is a basic activity in this game and we should just be able to do that without a weird unnecessary requirement of getting some item, the rune is unnecessary

my great skill and efficiency

make the "sail" button work only with a DLC please we should also do it with the "sail" button any ship other than basic cutter should also require one DLC for each ship oh, and did I mention a DLC required for the "sail" button to work? we NEED that

hahaha easily triggered XD

the great nation of Great Britain is still in charge of a lot of ports!!!

both fleets had similiar power

so is the tactic "hey, come and sink yourself so I can win" these days?

yeah so just suffer, nub

sometimes my posts are a bit ironic and Im joking about something being so great, but of course it's good that GB was trying to do something instead of staying passive, isn't it? it's indeed one of the top nations for now

well apparently some individuals seems to cry about russia being too strong and killing the game by playing or something like that, but picking a nation and playing is just how the game is supposed to be played and if some people organised themselves and became strong so be it, it's not like the losing ones couldn't do that if they wanted to - it's a valid playstyle, why should the ones who are losing against that be favorised? Russia spent a lot of time to build it's power, and it's not like this one is the most powerful since the beggining of the game. Some people cry about russia killing the game by playing but both groups are players and if the stronger one doesn't play the game is going to have a decline as well, which is exactly what I've been talking about in the previous post, this is not rocket science as we can see and this is one more reason to let players play and do RVR/PVP if they want to that's true. I've made a few posts with suggestions to reduce grind a few weeks ago(this would encourage people to risk things and provide content by doing PVP in cheaper ships, making the game more alive), but as we all can see, the devs didn't do anything about it so far I actually wanted to know what he meant by that, not you ... and he just replied with: without taking any more effort to make reasonable arguments..... perhaps his words apply more to himself? I will consider that as a give-up

you're free to play something else instead of naval action, but I think that those people are playing for themselves, and not for youself, and if they are playing it then it's probably fun and interesting for them and if the goal is for the game to have more players, then the fact they are playing indeed makes it have more players (more alive, not dead, you got it?) of course it might cause you to quit if you are a noob who just got defeated by them (it's not fun to lose, but it's just the nature of every PVP game, silly man, otherwise it's not PVP, and if you do not like that aspect, you do not have to force yourself into being under it's influence[you do not have to play a game with certain unchangable aspects if you do not like those]) but if they did not attack you, they would be gone, so it's always -1 group of players regardless of the case, which defeats the argument, because in both cases someone is going to be gone, and you can't tell which case is going to make more people quit, because you did not count anything or provide any evidence which allows to count the population loss - so which option really makes the game more dead? - can you reply to this with an evidence??? also define common sense - for them common sense could be something else than what it is for you, such as playing for themselves (when you decide to play a game, is your main goal to entertain yourself or some other player???🤔🤨) so... I'm still waiting for that argument which denies mine(because you did not do it and yet you said that you did it...)! (I tried really hard to draw a conclussion from your post, but it's just too shallow for me, perhaps you can help me do it? but this time I would like something clear, not vague) as for game mechanics, some mechanics are good, and some other ones are bad, I don't know what exact examples you had in mind, but what I was talking about was purely interactions between players and their impact on population, rather than game mechanics and things which are more related to those mechanics