Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

DaRho

Members2
  • Posts

    93
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DaRho

  1. hostile --> non aggression --> worst enemy --> allies. Politics can take some quite unusual turns....
  2. It is a bit confusing as in this thread, which is pinned in tribunal and therefore, I assume - official, it reads: but indeed, when You read further into discussion below that thread, there is a statement: On top of that, despite: ...i tried and can't find it, so there is some lack of clarity around this rule, hence this post to clarify what can and what can't be done in such cases, for future. If that's ok - cool - we'll add this to our tactical options in future battles as well :)
  3. I have certainly not attacked You personally, AFAIK. What You wrote above is also what I remembered, and hence I was surprised to hear that You got offended and wanted to see proof of that. Was not aware of the fact that You've had more Commonwealth encounters that day. However JanOwietz is definately a PFK clan member and he was in the same fight that a screenshot above was taken at. I don't believe he have insulted You as I was in that fight. I was one of the Endymions that chased You away towards Santo Domingo and it happened soon after the fight with aforementioned JanOwietz. Also, the PFK player You sank with Indef/trader in fleet, has not insulted You for sure. I assumed that You have not returned after that as I have not heard from anyone that You're back. That's all. I agree that we should close this conversation now, but please bring screenshots next time when accusing Commonwealth for verbal abuse.
  4. @NethrosDefectus - You've been informed by our players about the agreement and You chose to ignore it stating that no-one agreed this with You. I am unable to reach every single GB player with communication about agreements done with GB admirals and expecting that from me is just looking for a poor excuse not to follow those. That doesn't matter now. I'm closing this discussion with You. I have acknowledged the fact that You are not interested in the agreement and have communicated this to PFK players accordingly. Case closed.
  5. As mentioned above, I am not going to explain anything else to You. We've had a good dialogue with Mr Pellews, Batman and I believe we did achieve an agreement. Based on Your statements we now know, that clan MOO can be removed from that list (EDIT: of clans that signed the agreement) just as clan TRIBE and no-clanies are not included. We are ok with that - it's a pity that we didn't know about it yesterday, when You attacked our player who trusted (according to agreement), that he is safe to move his ships without an escort from Les Cayes to another Polish city nearby.
  6. And yet, You suggest us to be a PvE nation... @NethrosDefectus I'm sorry, but I see no point in discussing anything with You. We seem to be unable to find any common understanding.
  7. How many interactions with Commonwealth players in OW did You have yesterday? I was certainly part of one of them and it included You and @NethrosDefectus attacking and sinking one PFK players and then us attacking You back. This is also, when the discussion about You not following the agreements unveiled. You stated Your opinion, which I accepted and assumed to have open PvP with You and Your friend. Unless You've had any other interaction with polish players yesterday, I would assume that Your statement bellow related to the situation described above. If You've had any other open PvP interactions with Commonwealth yesterday that I'm not aware of, I'd like to hear clan name and / or player names that participated in those, however You already mentioned that you "can't remember" and did not take any screenshots, so I believe we won't be able to settle that...
  8. @NethrosDefectus - I have just spoken to Batman and Mr Pellews on our TS about it and I have nothing more to say here. If You wish to receive more information, feel free to talk to aforementioned gentlemen.
  9. If by "actively" means to "provoke and then take screenshots of the 'abusive' reply", then I'd say not. But fell free to track the evidence of UNPROVOKED verbal abuses, with enough history stored to confirm that it was, in fact, an unporvoked abuse.
  10. I'm working on PFK's image and the moment and whenever there is an accusation that can potentially be understood as directing at us, I will ask to clarify the details to defend our name since, as You mentioned, I can only speak for PFK and not other clans in Commonwealth. And we will not accept any false accusations anymore. Also, we can't take responsibility for non-claners nor for rouge clans, just the same as GB can't so using attacks from non-claners and rouge clans as a reasoning for attacking the whole nation's capital is simply a bull-sh.t but we've got over that and there is no point in re discussing that. We lost the capital not because we were attacked, but because we couldn't defend it. That is very convenient excuse in that case. Since You have taken a liberty to recommend something to me, I will also recommend something to You: I recommend You to stop accusing anyone of anything unless You have a proof to support Your accusations. As already mentioned, we are not without a guilt, but I'm done with all the lies that abuse it and put PFK in even worse light later serving as a reasoning for aggression against us. If You want to accuse us of something - prove it! Otherwise, remain silent. I have already referred to that in my previous post as well as above and I see no reason to repeat myself in that regards.
  11. When You write "polish" player, people automatically think "PFK" as this is the clan that holds 99,9% of Poles in Commonwealth so any accusation like this is automatically understood as accusation against PFK clan. I am aware that we are not without a blame and we are working on improving that internally in PFK. I've been personally in contact with the people involved in that PvP situation while it was evolving to make sure that no such situation occurs. And here I hear that it DID, hence I'm asking for a proof. Otherwise it is just an empty accusation which we will be fighting against, as PFK has gained a bad reputation recently (I can't say that we're not to blame for that) and in order to improve it, we need to stand against any false accusations like this. So, If there was no verbal attack on You yesterday by PFK players, then I would like You to take back this accusation. Otherwise, please paste the screenshots or paste the link to the post You have created for that offense. If it was not PFK players that offended You, please share the clan name here, so that I could speak to the respective leader about it. Also, as Commonwealth, we are not taking any responsibility for actions of clan "Free tribes" clan ("TRIBE"). This is a free clan and we have no control over it.
  12. Could You please share some screenshots on this? Kind Regards, Darek.
  13. Nope, most of us are casual polish players who chose Commonwealth just because they want to sail under Polish flag and be in a polish-speaking clan, as many of us don't speak English. That's it.
  14. I'm glad at least someone has a sense of humor here
  15. Guys. The reasoning behind taking Les Cayes was of course, faulty, and (at least some) of Brits were looking for any reason to take it for a long time. Now it has happened and let's stop that shitstorm on forums. Let everyone themselves draw conclusions from the facts presented here already by Davos and Iro, and stop publicly insulting each-other at once. We were attacked, we organized and we stood against a bigger and more experienced nation giving our best, which unfortunately occurred to be not enough. We lost Les Cayes because we were unable to defend it and that is a main reason. Everything else I see as secondary. We now have more urgent things to focus on, like our economy for example and defending remaining ports from other nations trying to take advantage from the whole situation. Brits will need to deal with moral side of attacking the Captial of weakest nation in the game, themselves. End of topic.
  16. It gave us a lot of ideas on what we need to improve upon and generally gave us quite a few lessons to learn. Brits gained wind advantage at beginning and kept it throughout most of the battle and then started crushing us after a quite unfortunate command to tack the fleet in a wrong direction in a wrong moment. Shit hit the fan, chaos unveiled and we lost the battle soon after. It was an interesting experience. Actually - first PB experience for most of Commonwealth players that participated in that battle. We do regret losing our Capital, but we'll manage, rebuild, learn and come back stronger. Good fight and congratulations to winners.
  17. That was fun indeed and yes - AI is now terrified as well That was a fun day in general, I must admit btw. this fleet appeared on the open world as 2400 BR.... Bellona is 400 BR, and there were 10 of them in that fleet. Obviously there is something wrong with BR calculation mechanism.
  18. I know, it's not PvP, but I think it's still impressive
  19. Picture below shows, how feared we are in certain regions of Open World One needs to gather a significant advantage first before daring to challenge us
×
×
  • Create New...