Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Knuddel

Members
  • Posts

    306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Knuddel

  1. On 11/4/2019 at 5:51 AM, RubyRose said:

    i have had it done to myself as i have done it to others its part of the game and not against the rules. u could of simply surrendered, dropped sails, slowed down to close the distance, turn around and engage. so many options but u decide a tribunal is going to stop it is pretty funny. its like trying to get ganking removed from the game its not going to happen. did he pull u multiple times in a row and run away? no well then ur out of luck if he hadnt done that. and he did shoot at ur ship and damaged ya so if u run away he can do what he wants when chasin his prey.

    Surrender: Haha lol seriusly surrender to a guy which objusly just go into battles for let guys surrender caurse of Time?? Not realy funny not realy a gae u want to play right? 

    dropped sails, slowed down to close the distance, turn around and engage: Tryed all. Wasnt possible. He did that. Multiple times. 3 hours or more in total. He keept me just in his Controle range without shooting. as u see on those screenshoots. Ruby seriusly u want to play a Game where just that one wins which has more time?

  2. On 11/2/2019 at 8:02 PM, Knuddel said:

    NAB-94947

     

     i captured today with a clanmate 2 Fleetships 1 we could made free for all but both we could not capture or put crew on it.

    We both could not take any ships doesnt even get the X for looting or pulling Crew on it. We than broudsight both ships to death and even than we could not grab anything of the Loot. 

    1 ship was surrenderd that wasnt fully crew.

     

  3. NAB-94947

     

     i captured today with a clanmate 2 Fleetships 1 we could made free for all but both we could not capture or put crew on it.

    We both could not take any ships doesnt even get the X for looting or pulling Crew on it. We than broudsight both ships to death and even than we could not grab anything of the Loot. 

    1 ship was surrenderd that wasnt fully crew.

  4. that most complains about Loki rune is comming from PVP server is caurse we are PVP players. That means that you need repairs. Loki rune is mostly killing the guy whichis using it caurse u spawn into an AI which is A half dead b doesnt have repairs or is Beached. 

    And the mainthing is: With that thing you just have fun going into battles where you ahve Newbees, which may quit the game. I would Prefer to not have that thing on hte PVP server. Same with the Speedbost sails things this game is more and more like super mario cart. And thats not a compliment. Speed up all ships bei the Double open water speed, remove Loki run and those Speed things and put instead more of those Papers inside (but they are just usefull with GPS perk...)

  5. On 10/22/2019 at 2:06 PM, RubyRose said:

    please show me the definition that ur using that would make this griefing that has an admin or moderator ruling against this type as i have already stated this tribunal is a joke.
    screening or delaying action he is simply using the games mechanics to prevent u from escaping battle if ur stuck in his area control perk have u tried turning to face him chain him, blow holes in him. if ur running away from him and he's fast enough to keep u in control then he doesnt need to keep shooting to complete him mission, ur choise was to stay and run instead of surrendering to a ship that was clearly faster then u. he shot at u at first then when u started to run he simply followed ya.  done that myself before as well no point if i can keep up with an enemy to waste time lining up shots if control keeps him in battle while i was for reinforcements or for allies to get in position to retag. and trolling in game chat to an enemy is still fair game. not his fault u bit at the bait.

    I as you see on screenshoots yes i tryed to kill him and chain him and was bored to death... 

    I have tryed to fight him, he runned away. Stayed in controlerange. Tell me that you would like if i would do that to you. Come on. I will defenitly not waist my time or othere Peoples time that way but think about what you would do in my situation. 

  6. 2 hours ago, Thonys said:

    i think holding captains in battle for a reason >> is a valid tacktick (-like a delay for battle - or port battle - or reinforcements for others to enter battle )

     

    holding a captain for no aftermatt is called trolling. (i think but....)

    but sometimes when you hold a captain in battle long enough >> he surrenders 

    remember every battle is 1 . 1/2 .. hour.........

    if you don't have the time for that dont play.

    the decision what to do  is yours.

     

    remember development made the distance and the time set .

    in that theater the battle occurs ,

    if you want it different make a complain to development.

    some of y look like screaming babies

     

    Than tell me plz what was the reason. There was no reason behind it. And if you tell me that waisting time is a reason you should contact your Psycoloigic.

    • Like 1
  7. WTF pic. That was not happening. if i tag i fight until something change in the fight. And i retagged him several tiems caurse he was running away... and that was Screening.  

    Report of the next griefing.

    NAB-94485

    BTW i try to fight him during Screening actions and retagged him. He could always sail back to port but he doesnt want to. My intention was always fight and kill him. He is just greifing: Keeping shooting sails.  

     

    another 45 mins.

  8. No

    The Portbattle was Closed. For both sides bevor i sailed off. This battle started like 20 mins after teh Portbattle closed for both sides. I would not complain when this would be a Screening action. But that was just stupid waisting of time. And that is Griefing. He started the Fight he shoot a few rounds than he just keept me in his controlerange and had no intention to fight

    He atacked me in front of Ays. About Portbattlesy and Screening: Yes abosolut fair, but that was far off everything. Just waisting time. i think i should do the same with you and look how you wpould react. I was watching netflix while that "Battle".... 

     

    If that is how you want to use your Playtime... well i sugest you single Player games.

    • Like 1
  9. 13 hours ago, King of Crowns said:

    think about that for a second. the santa marta pb was won by forts...… stationary gun platforms that have very little coverage of the objectives.... keep being retarded please? as for defensive pbs.the map spoke for itself as do the screenshots.

    that didnt answered the Question about Offenciv or defensiv PBs, but ok. 

    My opinion is another: You faild to fill your clanmoney and dont want to take the Blame for it. 

    Have fun enjoy whatever you are doing now.

  10. On 10/11/2019 at 11:21 PM, Immersive Ganking said:

    Keep tellling yourself that Russia is not a zerg. Accoring to @qw569 in September 2019 Russians crafted 295 first rates ONLY in Vera Cruz. The Dutch build 141 first rates in Maracaibo and the Brits 129 in Truxillo. Add another 48 first rates from New Orleans and 41 from Campeche to the Russian numbers and you end up with 384 first rates for the Russians. Adding the 76 first rates build in Coro to the Dutch roster, it's still "only" 217 first rates crafted in September on the Dutch.

    Other nations simply cannot keep up with Russian numbers, please stop pretending that Russia isn't a powerhouse.

    I never Sayed that we dont have the Better infra structure... but i would still want to have numbers from the Devs.

  11. Hey 

    I play for Russia, and i am very sad that we always get called Zerg. In my opinion and according to numbers of the Clanleaderboard we arend that strong. But i would like to have numbers of Playerpopulation and i would prefer those numbers of guy which are usualy online more than 5 hours a week and going into Fights like PVP and PVE (activ Leveling). I think that we can like that get numbers which are not including alts (of caurse some alts will be in the Statistic, but mostly those alts will not be counted like that).

    • Like 1
  12. 21 hours ago, Raekur said:

    reaching their intended target. This can be either a port battle or a trade ship. While you as a "victim" may not agree with the tactic, your intended target may view it otherwise. So I guess t

    My intention was not to keep him in Usless battles but to sink him. 

    And to avoid guys going into PBs sint griefing. ANd he tagged me first so i cannt participate in the Portbattle ccaurse one of our Screeners took my place on command. Guys you are mixing 2 diffrent things up and his intention was just to waist time. He didnt shoot a single shoot just keept me in battle with Controle Perk thats just booring. If he would go for me and try to kill me i would not complain, but like that its just Griefing.

     

    His taktic was to make me Bored to death and thats just simple not Fair.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...