Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Banished Privateer

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Banished Privateer

  1. I haven't seen any for the Prince, you've gotta stick to the Pickle
  2. Did admin delete his post? I don't see it anymore lol
  3. But if we don't like the ship and decide to sink it, it means we get 0 rewards. Bad method, really bad.
  4. What is out of date? We didn't receive any new paints since 2016 and I do have direct contact with the OP.
  5. It's not just comparing them to 24pd longs stats, but also the fact that most 5th rates like Herc, Trinc, Pirate Frigate etc. will be excluded from using them. Edinorogs also do outclass 18pd longs in pen, dps, damage etc. 24pd longs are a little more competitive in terms of range/pen/accuracy.
  6. You totally ignored the fact about my comment to bump it into 24pd category + you can't craft them like normal guns. After the wipe, no one will have poods.
  7. Poods were nerfed recently. Last fix for them is bringing them back to 24pd slot.
  8. @Intrepido Pink Royale & Brest Harbor (only the old paints).
  9. Another problem arises when the battle is over (we can see that on the video above by Liqucity). Both ships have 100% water, boarding is still going on. First person to click leave - survives, other sinks (while technically both should be dead). If player A leaves battle first, player B dies. If player B leaves first, player A dies. Not only it creates an unrealistic situation of magic force keeping 2 ships afloat, on rare occasions faster-clicking LEAVE button player or player with lower ping wins.
  10. But the Frenchman was not sinking! We have a situation of BOTH ships with 100% water in boarding. They are magically afloat.
  11. Both ships are in boarding. Both ships have 100% of the water. I thought the concept of not sinking ship in boarding is that 1 ship is grappled to another afloat ship. How does the logic and physics work with both ships going down, but holding each other afloat due to boarding?
  12. Not sure where to post it, but new paints are invading Caribbean today soon...
  13. Not sure if I should thank for the mention or I feel offended 😏
  14. Some smashin' at KPR that happened yesterday: And some more, but I haven't been in all of the battles.
  15. The weird thing is that friendlist is one-sided. The removed person should be removed on both ends.
  16. But you do know right, that there are MMO games where players don't use alts because there is no point to use them? It's the game itself that creates opportunities and encourages players to buy alts in order to get a greater advantage. There are still things that can't be used as "workaround DLC or game mechanic" as a number of outposts, different officers (eco officer on alts), tows per day limitation and many more! Here, I can buy an alt, set my crafting officer (would be very stupid to do on my main PvP account), get extra tow and "eco-outposts" while my PvP account uses "PvP outposts" etc. If you get the point, Devs don't need to forbid the alts. Just make it so normal players are not bottlenecked, limited and inferior to players with alts. For example, Admiralty Connections DLC was a step in the right direction to ease the problem.
  17. That would be very costly and expensive "review-bombing". It's a double-edged sword, buying alts helps development and increases the income of Devs, but once the customer is not happy, he can voice his opinion multiple times for every purchase he made. Just like I can put a negative review on every DLC that I've purchased, it's almost the same. Every purchase = 1 review. We might rather look on the other side how to prevent that and the way to go would be... create a game environment where alts don't give greater advantages over normal players and turn it into sort of "P2W". Isn't it ridiculous that some people own 10-20 alts in this game?
  18. Looking at the reviews posted by this person, do they qualify as spam or off-topic? They look really legit, even if we know that he uses alts. They describe the game and mechanics, opinions involved, no foul language. Based on that, his "imaginary-friend-steam-account-reviews" have no reason to be removed, am I right?
  19. Yesterday I exploded in my full crew and good HP L'Ocean, because another 1st rate was firing at me. 1 ship. From one stern rake my survival went up from 12 to 80 and then I got into fireshock. Once I was in fireshock, the enemy ship sailed side by side and just kept shooting me every time he reloaded, making my fire spread and I couldn't do anything. Can't turn, can't return fire, can't use rigging/manual sails. I could only sail in a straight line, see enemy ship fire on me continuously and watch my ship explode. This is a big bummer in my opinion. This wasn't a focus fire of 5 ships, it was just 1 ship shooting broadside/guns every 20-40 seconds. Another point, having a ship with 1000+ crew, only 100 of them fighting the fire??? Is this some sort of a joke, as what are the other 900 people doing? Watching the ship burn? Making a barbecue? I want all my 1000 man to fight the fire and extinguish it as quickly as possible.
  20. Must have ship equipment after 19.03.19 hotfix for every ship: ( @AeRoTR and I can refer to this ) \ Attaching related video by @Sir John:
  21. NA playerbase is 10 million players, sleeping and waiting for the game release and next update #confirmed_information
  22. The NA subs on my channel are surely less than 1000. I did get thousands of subs and views playing stupid P2W mobile games that are played by millions and being top 300 player Also, I never asked or demanded Devs to give me stuff because I'm a youtuber or twitcher, even though many other games and their Devs do give tons of stuff for you. In the previous game I played and recorded (CC) which I gathered so many viewers, Devs of the game had a special Content Creator group, they would give you in-game currencies, special heroes and items, pay you with real-life currency for creating content (monthly or per hour or per view), special account on test server for recording update videos before they get released, with all stuff unlocked etc. And you know what? I don't feel bad that I don't have all that stuff in NA and gifted by NA Devs, also it's so silly when brain-washed players think that NA Devs make the game just for us and everything we request lol, these claims are ridiculous and funny and I bet you will admit it. I would rather see that full server with 2500 players than NA Devs throwing free and premium stuff at me. The reason why I mention all of that is because of Joerson or whoever it was attempted to say that Devs create the game for streamers lol
  23. Devs do support streamers, but I would have to lie to say that it's done in a biased way. Other games and developers throw tons of free and premium stuff at popular streamers, in NA devs only do chat a little with us and give a small donation from time to time. Streaming comes a great risk of many players streams-sniping you or watching your battles to counter your actions. Delayed streams do help with these issues, but the bigger delay, the less interactive stream.
  24. I didn't say the PB was toxic or that I'm the saint. NA environment causes toxic behaviours, that's why we see it all over the place.
  • Create New...