VirtuallyIdiotic
-
Posts
1,586 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by VirtuallyIdiotic
-
-
Haven't played since April 2020. What I miss?
-
1 hour ago, Hammy said:
Owning the Northern masters depot lol. You have seen all the russian alts buying it all right?
I havent seen a Northern Masters since the exit from early access.
-
Both sides were tired out. The Devs, in their infinite wisdom during this COVID-19 isolation, decided to remove cooldowns did not help. It felt like on both sides it was coming to a desire to end the war. It was a back and forth war with very little to no progress. Would not surprise me if the war continued Russia would have lost their progress like they have in the past and then make gains another day. It was becoming a 10 round boxing match against two pretty even fighters exchanging blows. Game is horribly flawed.
-
4
-
-
5 minutes ago, Archaos said:
So to use your logic, Truxillo was a BASTD port, they got pissed off with HAVOC taking GB ports and decided to give the port to a small Swedish clan. It is their port and they can decide who they give it to.
Even calling that alt a clan is a joke. It is one alt with the soul purpose to exploit the holes in the RvR system to prevent a total loss of Truxillo.
7 minutes ago, Archaos said:Your argument does not work. If San Juan was HAVOCs and all HAVOC changed nation, how come the port did not become neutral? Someone must have stayed in Danish nation to remove all other Danish clans from friendlist till HAVOC had raised hostility and taken port. Why did HAVOC not just let the port go neutral and join in the free for all to raise hostility on the port? Because the only way they could guarantee getting the port themselves was to play loosely with the rules.
HAVOC and the other Danish clans burned bridges between one another far in advance and the Danish clans were removed from the Friends list a long time ago as requested by the Swedish clans who were requested to help flip San Juan for HAVOC and their return to Sweden. Hence, why it never went Neutral. It was not something that occurred in a day or even a week. This was going on for a full month after HAVOC had enough with the other clans of Danmark and vice versa. The deterioration of Danmark was not a single individual or even a single clans fault, but rather the inability for the clans to come to compromises and work together in a functioning manner. If Danmark was a much larger nation their inability to see eye to eye could easily be overcome much like you see in Great Britain where obviously not every clan is on the same page but are still able to function as a nation. In a smaller enviroment this is not sustainable.
-
Lack of variety in certain aspects of the game.
What I mean by this is certain parts of the game like RvR and even PvE have become at times almost a routine. PvE it is a grind. Hard to get new players committed into the game when most go through PvE to grind through the ranks and try to improve themselves safely in the game. The missions do help with this but still are very grinding. Then with RvR there is only one gametype, capture and control. There were other port battles in early battle that did things differently to a degree. Otherwise things become dull and repetitive. It is not that things in the game I do not like but rather the game can be pushed farther and expanded upon.
-
5
-
-
-
17 hours ago, Vizzini said:
great stuff , best thing since @Jeheil left us
Forever missed.
-
4
-
-
I just came back from a break since early summer, I bought a bunch of buildings and upgraded my shipyard, A major war is coming, mission rewards have been adjusted, another $40 dlc ship, and the in-game economy has inflated.
Screw the economy! Screw this war over a childish hello kitty squabble! Not worth $40 ship! I just want to be a privateer!
-
29 minutes ago, admin said:
Wrecker De Ruyter Stern gallery
-
Does anyone have that Pirates of the Caribbean gif of him doing a hard turn of the ship with the letter "D" getting spammed across the image? Been looking for that image for a while but cant find it.
-
3
-
-
5 minutes ago, Staunberg said:
Sweden would not be able to uphold it.
And Danmark the same. But without giving it a chance you never know for certain.
6 minutes ago, rediii said:You have no idea who let build up who here my dude
-
21 minutes ago, Staunberg said:
DNP said no to an OW agrement, simply because it wont work. We tried that with the polish, trust me we took a lot of shit on that account, even if we where the only clan that did RvR at that time in Dk-Ng.
It simply didnt hold and every day, either a polish ore a dane complained abouth somebody killed them. It got so bad that the polish even protected havoc(when Gb) when they did hostillity to flip Fajardo.
You do understand unlike with the Poles, who it was stupid to even make an agreement with those flakes, Sweden was not asking for a complete no PvP OW agreement right? If it was a complete no PvP ow agreement I would side with your opinion that it should not be accepted on the premise of the difficulty in maintaining such an agreement.
1 hour ago, rediii said:same here, nope. Denmark was open for that deal, Sweden didn't reply anymore after we proposed the deal without DNP
Without all the major parties involved which Sweden was able to achieve yet Danmark failed to do, there was not going to be an agreement able to be maintained. Sweden would have lived up the agreement as long as it could tolerating for a time DNP attacks around our crafting and capital waters, but it would only tolerate for so long before everything crumbled. You know that.
Sweden played ball and did not aggressively go against Danmark early after release focusing more on building up against Russia and giving space for our neighbors to move crafting material as unhindered as possible. Danmark did not share the same methods in return. Sweden then proceeded with a diplomatic route which was on every account faltered by not all of Danmark coming into agreement. During this time we continuously would help Danmark against Russia via screens and other means. Seeing that there was no agreement that was going to be compromised upon we dropped the diplomatic route and just accepted they would want open world PvP. We proceeded to do so and then Danish clans became upset. Sorry but we are not the United States or Great Britain. Sweden will not and is not going to sit idle and be farmed in such a manner.
-
2
-
-
No and yes. It increases the chances of a drop does not guarantee a drop.
-
What?
-
2
-
-
Just now, Koveras said:
Well then he's a dirty scoundrel!!
On a related note... May I recommend raiding the gulfo del Maracaibo?
Good farming there if you do not mind the trip.
-
1 minute ago, Koveras said:
As I recall you're dutch right.
He is Pirate.
-
25 minutes ago, Staunberg said:
What do you think is a significant number. To my knowledge most Pb between Russia and Dk-Ng have been with 1 rate. I play with my son, so we share ressources. We together can build 2-3 1 rates a week. We are 2 players. Think by now the frogs have had time to build a 1 rate fleet.
They are rare if you ever spot them. France lost a lot a RvR and PvP player base. They are in a very slow rebuild phase. More casual players and new players than anything now.
-
I dont know if anyone in the swedish nation has volunteered yet. If not since I do not plan on moving I will volunteer for that nation.
-
2 hours ago, Staunberg said:
Ssssh, dont tell, you might ruin DNP reputation as evil gankers of noobs and traders. Though said we are a couple of guys that have found some pleasure in tagging a single trader, just to demast it and then sail away.(ofc no top name player/clan will be spared).
DNP is not evil. Frustrating at times, but that is all and who isn't. You guys one v one are some of the more enjoyable battles I have had. Hopefully that continues.
-
1 hour ago, Severus Snape said:
1st rates should have their place in the game at the more important ports. It should not be every deep water port.
Agreed. Although 1st rates should not be the majority of what is seen in a PB is what I mean.
-
16 minutes ago, Severus Snape said:
Up until a couple months ago 10-14 players was all that was needed for most PBs, including shallows. Now....not so much.
It is a pity too. A lot of those PB with smaller BR were enjoyable. Now it is just 1st rates galore and it is pretty dull to watch those battles.
-
11 minutes ago, Immersive Ganking said:
You didn't read me correct. Why did you change the timer to 02-05 only after @Captain Reverse attacked? Why was the timer outside of Sweden primetime before?
Have to ask PURG3 about that really. Both EU and US/Aus timezones player bases in Sweden are about even. Although recently majority of the RvR players in Sweden are more in the US/Aus timezone. It was not much of the second attack by BF that brought the time to that frame anyways. Been a major discussion point in our app chats for this week and decided on one a few hours before BF attacked Puerta Plata Sunday.
-
5 minutes ago, Immersive Ganking said:
Sure, but why not put the timer immediately at a time where Sweden can defend?
We can defend then. We do have a good size US and AUS timezone player base now with TRAP. Otherwise we wouldn't set that time knowing our neighbors have a large US timezone presence.
-
@Reverse If you guys want to come by with the same sort of fleets every weekend that is awesome. Would love a fight. Hopefully when I am not working. Sweden though only has three regions and cannot afford to lose any. Hence, the time change is placed where majority of the RvR clans player base is available. So again, love to see BF coming down for big PvP battles.
[SLRN] Sea Lords Royal Navy - Recruiting! - GB, PvP, RvR
in Guilds, Clans and Trading companies
Posted
You might want to just hit them up in game. I dont think the forum is actually being used like it use to.