Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Samuel Smith

Members2
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Samuel Smith

  1. On 1/13/2019 at 4:12 PM, GDE | Faigaf said:

    Hello captains, 

    I've been aggressed at willemstad by 3 "requins" while france and holland have a non agression deal for traders. 

    I tried to talk with him and never answered. 

     

    I want refund from dutch nation and these player banned from that nation, they must go to pirates. 

     

    MPPTS clan:

    Count Blah

    Swedish chef

    Lord stattler

     

     

    one problem is that you write it all in team chat too just wanted to point that out..

     

    • Like 1
  2. 8 hours ago, Chevalier du Ethuville said:

    Have the missions have the loot, and make Group missions more demanding and have the most loot ( obviously ). 

    That's my opinion. Now you can give yours. Thanks a ton.

     

    but what would the point of epic events be if they just added them to missions? then you could do them all day. with the way epic events are today, you got to locate them first and that's half the fun or not. I appreciate you allowing us mere mortals the opportunity to express our opinions.

    • Like 1
  3. 3 minutes ago, Msk said:

    in response to the spanish dictating where we can and cant play, being told we must buckle down, and coming down to screen for the americans. I hate to break it to you, but there is no way you can spin this that doesnt have spain provoking the war. The first act of war was showing up to screen against us with a leader of one of the most influential clans of the nation, after we "evening" french helped screen an earlier turneffe attack. Spain was at fault for first act of aggression. 

    oh you mean when you attacked the russian port? Russia being the allies of Spain what do you think would happen? then spain did not grind hostility at any french ports before you took a spanish port... so the aggresion is all on the part of spain? you where informed about the consequences attacking the russian port would have, you proceded with the hostile acts. then attacking spanish port... that makes Spain the aggresor, of course i see it now.... not really your logic is Flawed!

     

     

  4. On 9/6/2017 at 2:24 PM, Teutonic said:

    When you said "Indian" I honestly thought you meant India. (So the Pictures helped me realize that it is in fact, NOT India, but the Mid-West landscape of North America haha).

    Not that it is any problem, but the distinction could be "Native American" too. This is not meant to poke at you or anything.

    running around india would be fun too? 

  5. On 8/10/2018 at 7:50 PM, Christendom said:

    You have the ability to prevent night flips.  You choose not to.  Hold less territory or be prepared to lose it.  It’s very simple.  Every nation so far has been the victim of off time flips since the merge with the exception of Spain.  You’ve been in a quiet little bubble of safety because you’ve either been allied with the night flippers like the US or WO, or friendly with them in the case of myself.  JAGs and 7up started this little war and they are the only ones who can make it stop.  He’s managed to piss off the pirates and the night time French.  Sounds like he should stop negotiating for you guys.  

    For every pirate port attacked from here on out, Spain will lose 2 more at night.  We’ll then start screening for the Brits also.  You’ll lose either most of your ports or drain your banks with timers.

    So here are the terms.  JAGs apologizes to myself and the evening French ( if they want it ) for interfering with our port battles.  He keeps his nose out of future evening affairs.  We keep our current ports, you can have vacas.  And the night flips stop.  I am not unreasonable.  Accept or don’t.  I don’t care.  I’ve made Spain quit before and don’t mind doing it again.  

    HA you so funny

  6. 4 hours ago, Gregory Rainsborough said:

    Allow clans to set tax levels for different nations. Rather than letting it be a general 10% let it be like this.

    Spain owns port.

    Spain tax rate - 0%

    GB tax rate - 100%

    French tax rate - 100%

    Russian tax rate - 10%

    American tax rate 20%

    Something like that.

    It's create conflict between certain nations, more incentive to take ports controlled by other nations. Can also raise tax rates on own nation beyond the lame 10% that it is now.

    you mean "spanish tax rate -0%" just helping you out, dude.  but this aside yes it would be a great addition, to the game with clans being able to set tax rates for different nations in the ports.

     

    20180804223213_1.jpg
    for example if i wanted to sell this snow for 2million gold to spanish then 2.5 too french, and 10 million to british guys.

  7. 4 hours ago, admin said:

    Ruleset does not know if a pirate is allied to a certain friendly nation (which happens all the time in game and happened historically), or is a truly neutral pirate. 

    3 rules exist

    • Outlaw battles are free for all
    • Pirates are outlaws and law does not protect them when they attack each other. As a result reinforcements are not sent when pirates settle scores between themselves - it is their own business. 
    • Outlaw battles allow everyone in - if they are in the vicinity of pirate waters every pirate can join them and help their side.

    Removing outlaw battles will remove the opportunity to settle scores between pirates and turn them into a unified nation.

    If this is desired (its possible).
    Pirate nation leaders should request to convert to Pirate Republic of Nassau (real country which existed for 11 years). If they wish outlaw battles to be removed. 

    Perhaps its time to remove outlaw battles. And play as a pirate republic of nassau. 

    would the capital then be Nassau? 

  8. Just now, Skully said:

    Try asking that question on http://forum.game-labs.net/topic/22232-merge-servers-please/ and see what gives.

    Do you have anything related to the topic at hand?

     

    yes i agree with you about the starting level and such but would it not be a idea to put it to the pacific but let it be forgiving zone if you will :P too learn and the likes and when they are ready they can leave the pacific, when they get their first commision(getting a frigate or so) or so and then they will get to choose wich faction they can join in the caribean.

    • Like 1
  9. On 13.1.2016 at 10:12 PM, BuccaneerFlint said:

    The big reason was for HMS St Lawrence never saw action, because her presence on the lake deterred the U.S. fleet from setting sail. So, actually her mission was a success although the United States won.

    the us didnt win the war of 1812 they failed as they declared war on britain not the other way around, second the british sacked the Us capital so who won? the us lost most of their trade at the time as the royal navy essentially shut down us trade.

    Would be nice with the hms St. Lawrence in the game.

  10. another thread being pushed into the gutters because of some people that think that they are all powerfull and always right, guess what you are not at the end of the day the highest authority in/on this game is the Devs/Admin team so embrace the suck if you think it sucks but that is the way it is....

×
×
  • Create New...