NethrosDefectus
-
Posts
565 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by NethrosDefectus
-
-
4 minutes ago, Flinch said:
Does this mean Belize is up for grabs?
2 minutes ago, Christoph said:i hope
1 zone is enough for every nation
Yes because you've kept Vera Cruz all this time by defending it in port battles.
- 2
-
I thought that leaderboard only applied to pvp?
-
27 minutes ago, staun said:
Not sure right now it is the thought about wipe, thats make ppl take a short break. But thats for another tread.
Lets see those new things. A bit worried when I go hunting I end up fighting a AI fleet, and not players. But we can’t know before we se how agressiv they make the Ai’s
Ok but bear in mind these are NOT patches notes, they are plans for the first half of 2019, that's a space of SIX MONTHS
These will not bring back the players that have left while they wait for a wipe
- 1
-
@admin While all of this looks very exciting and I cannot wait to try it out, there is currently another issue that needs addressing (one that I'm sure could have been avoided by keeping things closer to your chest). At the moment the player numbers are disastrously low, I would be willing to put money on a major cause being the talk of "wipes" far too early in advance.
People have just stopped playing because they dont see the point in playing if they are going to lose their ships and warehouse contents down the line at some point (I dont understand the mentality myself but hey ho) They clearly do not understand the concept of buying a game still heavily in development and what is involved that in terms of wipes and resets.
Is there anyway you can move things around in such a way that would allow you to do said wipe soon but also allow you to make UI and optimisation changes afterwards.
I guess what I am saying could you perhaps consider prioritising the economy and resource changes (I assume that's one of the main reasons for needing/holding off on the wipe) so the wipe can be done and we can get people actually playing the game.
At the moment its a loop, player numbers a VERY low and therefor much harder to find a battle at sea, as such people decide they dont want to spend a couple of hours sailing for nothing and just don't log in. That then means less players logging in and it just repeats.
- 5
-
3 hours ago, Cabral said:
Great underwater screenshots? Yes, increases gameplayability for you and other players that take advantage over others that don't know the featture.
Because you've never used the F11 Bug report to give the exact position of a battle or enemy ships right?
Exactly the same principle, I'm sure not everyone knows about that either
- 3
-
Another thing, How is anyone supposed to sell their PvP marks without contracts? It's difficult enough to get PvP to pay for itself as it is. Some of us dont want to grind AI or spend hours making trade runs.
-
@admin Any idea how long this will be in effect for? It sounds like it will basically ruin the trading for most people.
-
1 hour ago, OjK said:
Reading between the lines:
New UI, and Economy Reform is matter of days now instead of weeks?
I think he means the contracts changes will be within a few days
-
4 hours ago, Gregory Rainsborough said:
I'm impressed. I can't multibox for shit.
It's true, he is actually terrible at it, although his single boxing can leave much to be desired at times as well
- 1
-
A tactic particularly effective against the Spanish fleets waiting outside battles as well!
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
-
Might wanna de-power, perfect angle for leaking there
- 3
-
Admin has already stated this is unacceptable behaviour
- 1
-
18 hours ago, MarKozPL said:
Hey
How can I join PRIV?
I played a long time ago ... 😞
@OjK One for you
-
1 minute ago, Despeinao said:
I aks you for spanish player Pepinus, and some mate of you said that he was an alt of Lantia.
We said LANTIA is an alt, a British alt
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Despeinao said:
Clan issues are secondary, in not my clan. The report is for the use of an alt in RvR, banning a mate to join into battle.
The British did not have any alts join on the Spanish side, you misunderstood what we said about Lantia.
AND who would be stupid enough to openly admit it openly in the battle?
- 1
-
16 minutes ago, Despeinao said:
On October 1, 2018, we had PB in San Lazaro and a player named Pepinus joined the battle without permission, banning one faction mate to join us, and did not respond to any of our instructions in chat. Later I asked the English players if it was an alter and they told me it was the player Lantia, present in the battle too. I have problems with my keyboard and I could only take this capture. I have made a report with F11.
Thx for your replies and your time
"Lantia" is a British alt of a British player, nothing in the rules to say a player cannot multibox in port battles if both "players" are on the same side.
You are proposing that "Lantia" (who doesn't not technically exist) has an alt on the Spanish side in the battle. This is not the case.
- 1
-
22 hours ago, Batman said:
Hooray for @Gregory Rainsborough boarding in the last 10 minutes otherwise they would have just timed us out!
- 3
-
11 hours ago, Graf Bernadotte said:
Go ahead fixing the small problems of this game,. Meanwhile you lose more and more players (clients!) because the big problems remain.
Tow to port is a feature to safe time in a time sink game, or to outmanoevre hunters who have faster ships and more numbers than the few traders this game has.. If this feature gets removed people will not spend extra time for more sailing. They will dismiss the travel they needed a tow before. Don't believe that traders will become easy targets for laizy hunters at the docks of freeports then. Trade and offer will decline and prices will get a surcharge for higher risk.
And personally I will ask myself if this game is worth the time needed to adjust my accounts at the new game mechanic.
You are referring to the La Habanna - Batabano Stargate connection?
-
32 minutes ago, Graf Bernadotte said:
You forgot to tell that not one of your 1. Rates saw the home port anymore.
So you're saying it took you multiple battles to sink them? So like the Spanish usually do, just keep sending more ships until the enemy is out of repairs?
-
On 9/19/2018 at 4:45 PM, Hethwill the Harmless said:
Nah, it is "roleplay" man... you know... the kind the populace likes.
"let's all sit in port, pound our chests of how pro we are, shake hands and post random stuff in the national news"
I believe Batman is asking you to close this topic as its purpose has come to an end and has gone WAY off topic
-
16 minutes ago, Henry d'Esterre Darby said:
My box was full, please try again.
As to PMs regarding moderation, those are never responded to per instructions from GameLabs.
As a moderator that is often called upon for more difficult issues, I don't ignore anyone on the forums. Please stop such speculation, it doesn't help anything.
Wait? So the rule is "do not respond to anyone complaining about moderators"?
So there is no point in me messaging you at all then.
Moderators can behave how they like without consequences?
No wonder Gamelabs and the moderators have such a negative image on steam
Thanks for your time
- 1
-
Tried to send @Henry d'Esterre Darby a message as requested by him but received the error
"Henry d'Esterre Darby cannot receive messages."
Great work as usual
- 3
-
Repeatedly (and I am not the only one who has noticed him doing it) Hethwill has been unable to keep his emotions in check or remain unbiased when perfrom his duties as moderator on the forums.
Recently he has become rather aggressive and rude in his replies, sometimes being outright argumentative just to be an arse. He often deletes or edits people's post if their opinions clash with his own.
The worst thing about him editing those posts is that he can do it in a way that shows no "edited" tag meaning that he has at times deliberately adjusted posts to how he sees fit and in ways that do not reflect the opinion or sentiment that was originally intended but as far as anyone one the forum is concerned that is what you intended to say when it was in fact not.
He has used the same methods to edit his own posts without giving it the "edited" tag so that if proven wrong he has been able to say "that's not what I said though is it" (I have to say admin has been guilty of this at least once that I have noticed a couple of months back)
He has a habit of taking a thread off-topic (usually some tangent about coffee or some other crap) and then "verbally" warns others not to do the same.
*Now I am fully aware that I am not the politest of people on here and never will be, HOWEVER I am not charged with being a community leader*
All in all, @admin if this is what you consider to be a suitable "role model" (can't think of a the actual word I mean) then it is no wonder Naval Action has the playerbase that it does.
Thanks
- 19
-
1 minute ago, Licinio Chiavari said:
I always played in harsh possible PvP enviroment.
So I'd play such a "terrible" game.
Bollocks! What YOU do carries no risk to you at all, carry on.
- 2
Redundant security zones for Britain, Spain, France.
in News Announcements & Important discussions
Posted
@admin Now if you could make the large (if not all) forts inactive during open world battles outside of the zones then that would be amazing!