Yar987
Members2-
Posts
105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
Yar987's Achievements
Able seaman (3/13)
49
Reputation
-
RvR. It's repetitive, and unfun. Regular PvP is great, and I love the rush from it, but the rvr port flipping aspect just seems like a necessary evil at the moment. The BR limits on ports doesn't make sense without a dynamic BR system accounting for upgrades/woods. I'd rather see the current system go away, if more work can't be put into making it more intuitive.
- 188 replies
-
- 13
-
Very nice, can't wait to fill it full of holes!
-
State of shallow PvP?
Yar987 replied to Aegishjalmur's question in Feature proposals and Gameplay Help Q&A
Yes, it seems like anything that could mount a 9lb long gun could support a 32lb carro.- 68 replies
-
- shallow pvp
- meta
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
State of shallow PvP?
Yar987 replied to Aegishjalmur's question in Feature proposals and Gameplay Help Q&A
There is quite a bit of historical material to back up how carronades are implemented in game. I'm not saying it's the best gameplay choice (or is not), but there is a basis for how they are. "British Frigate vs French Frigate: 1793–1814" "An Elementary Course of Instruction on Ordnance and Gunnery" Primary source! "Constitution vs Guerriere: Frigates during the War of 1812" If these prove anything, it's that the supposed inaccuracy of carronades was from contemporary gunners not knowing how to aim them correctly, and those guns were actually more accurate and had better range than cannons.- 68 replies
-
- 1
-
- shallow pvp
- meta
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I like it, it's a great start. Choosing how policy gets decided and voted on is easily one of the tougher questions to answer. The only way to find out how it works is to try I think not being forced to do what your nation is doing is pretty important, and provides some relief from the voting system. That's the only area I think is going to need a bit more immediate fleshing out. Suggest that people play with their nation, but don't force it. It's already started there a bit with war rewards, and I think piracy and privateering are very key to making the system fun (later discussion though). Defying your nation could have penalties too, depending on the severity and type of defiance. Attacking a neutral/at peace nation for example could make you attack-able to your own nation, for instance. Nothing would be worse than being stuck on a nation that never does what you want. It's touched a bit on that by saying a large clan might be able to rebel, but what about smaller/single groups of people? Rerolling and starting again should not be the option.
-
Remove 1.5BR anti-gank programming
Yar987 replied to Bach's topic in Current Feature Improvement Suggestions
Exactly! Especially coupled with the changes in spawn position, being in formation on the OS is much more important. -
Port Fight Suggestion 15K Points Cap
Yar987 replied to Lord Vicious's topic in Current Feature Improvement Suggestions
Not exactly what was said.... So if mortar brigs go more toward the fort-bombardment side, what should their BR be considered for port battles? They'd be fairly ineffective against ships sure, but wouldn't they be more important in taking a port? -
Port Fight Suggestion 15K Points Cap
Yar987 replied to Lord Vicious's topic in Current Feature Improvement Suggestions
Perfectly said! Don't forget crew mechanics either. Hiring, paying, provisioning, or training crew, depending on how deep the system goes, will definitely influence ship choice. -
Pirate Mechanics Vote
Yar987 replied to B4NGSPL4T's topic in Current Feature Improvement Suggestions
A little would go a long way there. People seem to get hung up on things and talk in circles about them (pirates, first rates), instead of looking forward. It's hard to balance a game when not all of the mechanics are in yet. -
An Essay on Naval Tactics: Systematical and Historical, with Explanatory Plates, in Four Parts, John Clerk, 1824 Part 1 was published in 1790, but was privately distributed in small numbers starting in 1782. Parts 2-4 were published in 1797. This version, published in 1824, has footnotes added by the author, editor, a Royal Navy admiral, and an Officer. Lots of detail on tactics, and great outlining of what when wrong in some engagements. Some insight into fleet compositions, level of ship upkeep, and ship characteristics. It gives a good account of how it took fleets multiple hours to form a line, hours and hours to close on an enemy fleet, and days spent just maneuvering without actual fighting. It's primary concern was getting rid of the ineffective tactics used during the 18th century. Nelson put this style of engagement to use at Trafalgar.
-
Having certain ships restricted would be good, but having all of them limited would make playing smaller, less historically powerful nations tedious.
-
Server playing catch up from the large battle maybe?
-
People get hung up and frustrated on mechanics that aren't yet finalized (or really even initiated). If anyone is feeling worn, or always bored, take a break! The stuff you're playing with now will be wiped anyway . Don't burn yourself out. It'll take away from your enjoyment when it's a fully featured release. I did that with a another naval-based game in the past. Went hard in closed beta and then open beta, and by the time actual release came it seemed tedious. I'd played each part of the game piece by piece in testing, never getting to enjoy the full experience all at once. It was all due to my own fault! So for now don't get attached to your blueprints and gold, and don't worry that such and such clan when pirate.