Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

jodgi

Tester
  • Posts

    4,454
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by jodgi

  1. ... or it could be a symptom? "The chicken and the egg"... All this clan based stuff may work out fantastic, but I'm not betting even "et rødt øre".
  2. Aww... I wish I could come up with satire like that.
  3. Ok. It's not what I picture with the term "player driven economy", though.
  4. Nice, you shot your own "suggestion" dead in the third line. It is. But I doubt the effect will last beyond our current pre-wipe depression. It would be hilarious if it did, and I don't mean in spite. It annoys me that the gankers and revenge gankers have managed to coin their safety based playing style as hardcore. It's so softcore it's embarrassing. I bet the duel feature would work better on PVE than PVP server. PVE players have per definition showed more integrity by opting out of the gank or be ganked world. That shit is for the weak.
  5. We haven't seen the new port features yet, but as I understand it clans can open up for friends investing (dubs, cash, marks?) in ports and production. Wouldn't it be weird to be taxed as an investor or partner?
  6. No, because any nation has access to capturable ports outside any zone.
  7. Hehe, I've never managed to gind up to RA on my own, I only achieved that rank from server split and later merge redeemable.
  8. Ooof, ye, eco stuff is very boringly grindy. yes, I wish we didn't have it at all. That is scheduled to change. Looks like the devs listen, eh?
  9. No, you said: "When ppl stated what they perceived was wrong with the game they were banned"
  10. Guys, you forget that he's not suggesting negative votes only positive votes.
  11. What he said wasn't abusive, but his "idea" is quite simply a lie.
  12. I also remember the testing rules of "report exploits instead of using them. People who use exploits may have their progress reset."
  13. Perhaps eco sandboxes get more review bombed than single account games, i dunno, I haven't payed much attention to such games. I do remember that around the time we were hit by the SORRY review bomb there was also a lot of blogging and discussion about a review bomb over at PUBG, so it seems single account games aren't safe either. In the face of review bombing and reviews as a tool to get back at devs I am completely unashamed of my postive alt reviews. All this has taught me that negative reviews are the most unreliable and positive reviews with caveats are the most informative. In my opinion, of course.
  14. Lol. I can actually keep two thoughts in my head at the same time. I have always wanted pvp-on-demand but I've never wanted to dismantle OW with such content. Yet again I'm dumbfounded by the fact that an arena guy is fighting for true OW while OW fans would throw it under the bus for moar PvP.
  15. So you want to diminish the importance of wind in this sailing game?
  16. To my knowledge the only thing that gives you a better chance at special ships is crafting in a capturable port. This might change a little too a lot in upcoming patch.
  17. You've never played WoT, WoWS or WT have you? I'm not even sure I see what you're getting at...
  18. No coincidence at all. Of all those qualities you list I'm only interested in one: PvP, and when combat mechanics in EvE are what they are, there is absolutely no reason for me to play. I'm sure EvE is a fantastic game for those so inclined. The reason why I often take the bait in these discussions is because many posters desperately push the "arena will fail" idea. I know why so I try to refrain from even commenting. This is not that day. We can do the pissing contest. NA OW was great/is great/will become great. NA combat mechanics are however better suited for PvP-on-demand gameplay and the recruitment pool is, by orders of magnitudes, larger.
  19. A bit of eye and hand coordination, sure, but it's not a ping and refresh rate exercise.
×
×
  • Create New...