jodgi
-
Posts
4,454 -
Joined
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Posts posted by jodgi
-
-
-
5 minutes ago, Ink said:
Please ask to send anyway
He says he will
-
15 minutes ago, Ink said:
Did they send a F11 report when it happened?
Doubt it, would it help if they sent one now, after the fact?
-
There was a tagging incident 20 minutes ago in OW.
A req + niag tried to tag a herc. 240 BR trying to tag 170 BR and they got a "BR too high" error message.
If this isn't a bug then what are we missing or what could have caused it?
-
5 hours ago, Sir Loorkon said:
Great to hear that. I hope OW PvP rewards will be promoted equivalent to the high risk and not only the patrol area.
What's higher risk than PZ fights?
-
But people already use the zones. What if people go there to actually get a fight within reasonable time? PvP for the sake of PvP?
-
8
-
-
31 minutes ago, Galt said:
Some explanation here would be much appreciated.
What ever do you mean? Admin did explain in the topic you linked. Would you change a working feature just because some dudes have played a cartoon game?
-
1
-
-
28 minutes ago, Galt said:
I think it's fair to say that people want a water rework
No, no, no... A few of you, maybe, ATLAS water would be a step back for me.
-
11 minutes ago, Angus MacDuff said:
PVP hunt missions should be worth a lot more than PVE hunt missions
QuotePvP reward missions on testbed are fake so we dont spoil the surprises in the main patch
about solo PZ but could be relevant.
-
4 minutes ago, Stilgar said:
4 pts for fleet perk 1? Increase to say 2 points probably makes sense, but 4? This will penalize both traders and pvp player that rely on capturing ships. Do not see the point. Keep in mind that beginners sailing ships w/o slots open rely on perks.
As others have already said; We get first fleet perk without spending points.
-
2
-
-
On 1/19/2019 at 6:55 AM, Admiral_Of_The_Fleet said:
hang on are you referring to steam hours or ingame hours???
in-game days.
6 hours ago, Admiral_Of_The_Fleet said:only you know the real answer..
This topic was a self-deprecating piece I posted because I'm a dirty PvE cheater.
I know some guys have done this challenge properly in the past; Some dude I can't remember but maybe also @Chevalier du Ethuville?
Go ahead and see how far you can go without docking up and don't mind idiots like me!
-
37 minutes ago, admin said:
we could not find a better explanation for (old unlocked)
Balls converge on water at first graze (when they first hit water). Maybe some linguist here can provide a better 1-2 word explanation for UIHm, not sure a linguist could help as the firing modes relate so heavily to something very specific and even unique we do in game, I'm open to be pleasantly surprised, tho.
BTW, it says "locked" or "unlocked" during countown and then changes to new terms after.
I assumed "locked" referred to locking to a specific point on the water (assuming a certain constant speed) and "unlocked" meant that the aiming point would follow your ships. So, very simplified you would use locked on a target that wasn't moving (Imagine a target raft or raking a ship stuck in irons). You would use unlocked to fire at a target sailing with similar speed parallel to your own ship.
The last sentence above is why it's so weird old locked mode is now called parallel. It does make sense since the cannons would be aimed closer to parallel of eachother than unlocked or "water", but we can see from the aiming overlay it isn't even close to the very specific geometry term parallel.
Maybe it isn't important if we use partially descriptive terms like locked/unlocked or parallel/water?
58 minutes ago, admin said:Balls converge on water
I could suggest the terms "raking fire" (locked/parallel) and "converging fire" (unlocked/water) as they are closely tied to what we see and do and sound more age of sail-y (?)
54 minutes ago, Apl said:You've removed the ability of changing ammo in prebattle - is it a bug or new mechanics to kill prepared perk?
You know what, Apl, it's ever so slightly annoying when you go passive aggressive instead of reporting and asking about possible bugs and changes on testbed. Save it to after the unwanted change is confirmed and they really want to "kill" prepared perk. Besides, it's not like it's completely useless to have every single gun loaded up with cannonballs with a close tag.
-
1
-
-
I SO look forward to duel zone!
-
2
-
-
But, but, but... That means there's an empty PB scheduled...
-
3
-
-
2 hours ago, Intrepido said:
ETA?
This week. Maybe today?
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, Baptiste Gallouédec said:
and i'm stuck.
You won't be stuck when someone else attacks.
-
5 hours ago, admin said:
don't wobble like cows on ice.
Oh, my! That's harsh!
-
Inb4 someone starts complaining about you taking the "skill" out of trading.
-
8 minutes ago, Simon Cadete said:
afk santi
?!??!
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, Iroquois Confederacy said:
However, I have no reason to believe my fears are unfounded.
Fears? You and me have lived through this already, it's not theorycrafting.
-
10 minutes ago, Licinio Chiavari said:
It will be a bloodbath.
A bunch of LO/WO + kiritimati ships with a couple fast scout/tagger ahead or even bigger fast hunting parties.
More massacre of traders (due to higher riskes for lone raiders), more massacre of casuals (being unable to bring at least numbers superiority).
More massacre of small teams/clans/solo players by bigger/more organized groups.
This is my bet. We'll see if I am wrong.
Didn't you quote Sun Tsu further up?
-
22 minutes ago, rediii said:
I allways thought you are pretty good from the posts you make in forum
and then I fought you in a battle.
Gloves off, huh?
Dude, I've said I'm shit for a long time. I haven't been ok since duel room went away, I get almost no training and I never got "good" at mod or repair meta. No, I'm easy prey in current NA, just like you experienced. I still love to fight you, nethros, Ram, Reverse, Cecil or any other of the good players I've been up against, I prefer taking a beating over bullying the weak.
You've been annoyed at me before, but that is the most aggressive post I've seen you make. Hmmm...
-
4
-
-
1 hour ago, Havelock said:
I summon @jodgi, who will squeak like a girl when reading this proposal.
No, I can't be bothered when we "want more pvp" while ignoring the root issue why ppl don't fight.
Go ahead and make OW like a shitty matchmaker, it's not like I'm OW's greatest fan so when you collectively want to ruin OW I might as well step aside because this will serve me more than any of you.
Let's do round two or three of pleasing the "I want to help my friends" crowd.
-
4
-
-
22 minutes ago, Preechur Blackheart said:
No. Is it a method beyond my capability? Yes.
I can help you, what part of this is the problem?
Also, bless your pure Legends heart, brother!
Can we see the statistical data?
in Patch Feedback and General discussions
Posted
Straight, no control used.
The point was that very few players die to bots in spite of your experience. Some people think that bots are content so they have to be somewhat challenging. Unless bots are OP and cheating they aren't a challenge at all.