Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Haratik

Members2
  • Posts

    673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Haratik

  1. On 10/18/2019 at 2:04 PM, Shaun said:

    Interesting. It seems torpedoes as a whole were also far less cruel too, as long as they don't blow up the ammunition. Hood and the Jutland ships all lost around 1,000 men each.

    indeed, it seems as if plunging fire from shells or bomb angles (again, plunging factor) did more to accelerate ship destruction than torpedoes.  I would imagine it had something to do with minimal protection on horizontal surfaces, made only worse with what had to be a rather one-sided thought process on where the most damage would be received: vertical surfaces.  It didn't help that the British had a very dangerous flaw in their turrets for loading the guns, something they took great pains not to repeat in the years after The Great War. 

     

    That said, look at any of the combat operations involving catastrophic sinkings by torpedo during WW2.  Loss only seems to be great where procedures weren't followed (Taiho, Barham, Shinano, Indianapolis):  Ark Royal, Eagle, and Wasp had fairly minimal casualties for the hits received.

  2. 1 hour ago, Illusive Tabby said:

    Seeing as they're not going to be adding steam power to Naval Action as DLC, I doubt they'll add the Cold War tech as DLC here. While I have started to want, more and more, a Cold War era Naval Game (with todays graphics and yesterdays attention to detail), I'd much rather see it in a different game to this. I dunno, an Ultimate Admiral: Missile Command, perhaps

    if a game like BattleStations: Midway, or a development of Empire Earth's game engine were made with Cold War era in mind I'd be totally down with it.

  3. Devs might consider it, but iirc from a historical standpoint, that particular form of turret arrangement was ineffective for multiple reasons, hence why it wasn't repeated in future classes.

     

    A closer look at the turret arrangement:

    Kearsarge_-_det1994013792_(crop).jpg
     

    Quoted from Wikipedia:
    Kearsarge had two double turrets, with two 13 in (330 mm)/35 caliber guns and two 8 in (203 mm)/40 caliber guns each, stacked in two levels.[5] The guns and turret armor were designed by the Bureau of Ordnance, while the turret itself was designed by the Bureau of Construction and Repair. This caused the guns to be mounted far back in the turret, making the ports very large. Admiral William Sims claimed that as a result, a shell fired into the port could reach the magazines below, disabling the guns.

    • Like 2
  4. 15 hours ago, Complete-Disaster said:

    uhm i would never recommend playing games on laptop in first place...

    Laptops have come a long way for gaming.  My last laptop could play anything available. My guess is his issue is hardware related, or he needs a fresh install.  I'm leaning toward the former being the case.  Naval Action isn't exactly low spec friendly.

  5. 7 hours ago, Koveras said:

    They did in the seven years war 1756-1763, as far as I know they'd been phased out of active line duty by the revolutionary wars.. I seem to recall the last 60-gunner were launched in 1780'ies but don't take my word for it. I know they were used on station in Caromandel during the american war of independence but don't know if they were involved in any line battles.

     

    EDIT: just reread @Surcoufs post and I'd wager that it's safe to presume that by 1779 the 60-gun ships had been moved to other tasks, if they were manufactured at all.

    Actually, several French 64s were in action at the Battle of the Chesapeake in support of Washington's forces at Yorktown.  French 64s saw continual action in battle up til 1783 from what I've read.  As to when the last were built, I cannot say.  I found some info on it, but nothing concrete.  Links posted below.   Surcouf might be able to answer your presumption more accurately.

    Sphinx class (1776)

    List of French lineships up to 1780

    Battle of Cuddalore (1783)

    French SoLs of the Louis XVI era

  6. On 3/21/2019 at 4:46 AM, LeBoiteux said:

    @Haratik Hoping we'll get info about Spanish shipbuilders of typical Mediterranean designs (xebec, felluca, polacre...), such as the Majorcan shipbuilders who built Le Requin and the other xebecs for the French Navy.

    I'll do my best!  Though it does seem as if Harbron was mostly focused on the ships of the line and their architects.  I haven't found anything concrete on smaller warships yet, but I'm looking for other sources online!

    • Like 1
  7. On 2/18/2019 at 4:45 AM, Thonys said:

    what a beautiful painting (look at the many long boats)

    look at the men on the Raas all cheering

    wished the Portuguese wherein the game aswell

    A beautiful painting of two seafaring nations not shooting at each other with their lineships.  Most paintings you see of two seafaring nations are of them brawling each other.  Symbolic of the longtime alliance between these two.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...