Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/26/2021 in all areas

  1. Year is ending, yet we got 0.5 core
    3 points
  2. Plus damaged equipment and electricals should also play a part. lots of things that are missing, that should be implemented into the game at some point.
    3 points
  3. I would be happy with how RTW2 handles it (which is realistic), the problem right now is we have neither. RTW's victory doesn't count on sinking all or X percentage of ships like we have here either. For reference I'm not talking about the campaign (which we can only make assumptions about anyway), but the game as is playable today. The directional messages won't help if the fleeing ship is faster, just reinforce how you will have "lost" the battle because the AI decided to make a straight line away from you until the timer expires. Not really engaging gameplay is it? But I agree I it sho
    2 points
  4. personally I would love to some soft RPG elements where you have option to skill your admirals, captains or officers. Or different archtypes. One engineer given you more speed another better damage control ect.
    2 points
  5. crew efficiency should not only depend on the crew itself. if they got forced out of a compartment by water then they should not be able to perform thier duties
    2 points
  6. 2 problems here. AI seems to be focusing VERY heavily on large caliber secondary guns, nearly every enemy capital unit I see has 8" secondary guns. This, coupled with the increased fire damage is resulting in many battles between capital ships being decided by who has the better secondary battery, rather than the main battery. Armor doesn't seem to help much with this issue, because with the current way armor weight works, on most hulls you have to chose between protection between large caliber guns with an all or nothing armor scheme, or protecting against smaller guns with a comprehensive
    2 points
  7. Closing to q4 of the year, and from the 'promised' 4 major updates in January, not even the first landed. Curious, when will we be able to see something wort mentioning...
    2 points
  8. Here is the link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HvvTzhhAjktfUN4JlfTddiS8E1dZya_z/view?usp=sharing Revision 00, first issued December 22nd, 2019 Revision 01, Updated Feb 04th, 2020 Revision 02, Updated Feb 28th, 2020 Revision 03, Updated Apr 18th, 2020. Revision 04, Updated Jun 26th, 2020. Revision 05, Updated Nov 18th, 2020. Revison 06, Updated Sept 30, 2021 Thank you for reviewing and help updating and correcting!
    1 point
  9. I very, very much disagree with this, and advocate for the biggest caliber you can fit for a few reasons: (1) Bigger calibers have much better range, meaning you can completely crowd out smaller ships' armaments (especially noting DDs which are limited to 5in guns, and an 8in gun could potentially kill a DD without ever giving it a chance to fire). This matters in the late-game as well because of it is much better to not let torpedo-carrying ships to get close as they get faster and more deadly (with more range as well). (2) As a part of their better range, they have much better accu
    1 point
  10. The range on 8" guns is about 15-16km, which, for the mid 1920's when I'm fighting this battle, is still considered "medium range" for most big guns. Generally, that'd be about where you can start reliably hitting each salvo, so you'd want to be in that range. With the equipment I had to hand, I'd like to be between 13 and 16 km away from the enemy, but that's well within the range of an 8" gun. It's kinda frustrating when the enemy can keep you at a range where you can't reliably hit them with your main weapons, with what is supposed to be their close range backup weapons. 8" guns on a BB can
    1 point
  11. I think once campaigns limit what you can do resource wise we will see less star destroyer ships.
    1 point
  12. It's one thing for the AI to disengage when there is a point to it (i.e. try to make it to a retreat zone to leave the battle), but there is no point to retreating in the current win conditions. It's also would be fine if the AI retreated to repair and re-engage at a better range, but it doesn't do that either in most cases electing to simply sail away in one direction for all eternity. You see it as a way to increase difficulty, I see it as an exercise in madness. You have seen the AI sail in circles when it knows it can't outrun you right? It can have a destroyed rudder/engines but sti
    1 point
  13. It's ok lad. I've been through the same thing before. Your studies are much more important than the game. Also screw the teacher for not giving you the info.
    1 point
  14. Sorry guys, I disappeared from this forum for a long time. I had a rough and bad month. I failed on the exams with my entire class, because we got tasks we never seen before and we never learned in the class. So we have to repeat the exams and try again. Sadly, I couldn't try the new stuffs in this update.
    1 point
  15. I am actively gagging and laughing at the shit they are saying, jesus I can't tell if it is just a very good troll or just a very confused person xd
    1 point
  16. A reminder, Nick clearly stated that any kind of map mode is not intended. Unless they change their mind... which would be for better honestly.
    1 point
  17. Yeah, like. Cpt.Hissy said, just ignore that person. It's always something with that guy. And it's never good.
    1 point
  18. This made me laugh, perfect image! XD 🤣
    1 point
  19. Oof, people, please. T'is but a fat troll. How you fight a fat troll? Not feed a fat troll. Ignore this account. That's one and only way.
    1 point
  20. Vae victis. But yeah, shitty troll, best move on.
    1 point
  21. Alright, hold tight. I'm here and I'm going to be a dick! Why, because I don't care anymore. @Elrerune The Honorbound Let's make some things perfectly clear. I am approximately 80% ethnically German, with the remaining 20% split up between the Baltic states and Scandinavia. One of my Great Grandfathers was named Ragnar Oskar Wilhelm Lunden, (grandmothers side, so I don't have that name, thus I don't worry about it being public knowledge) he - and that side of my family were born in the German Empire. He and they came to the United States while Germany was still an empire. The
    1 point
  22. At this rate, the entire forum will hate this one person within a month. Like squatter said, please ban this person.
    1 point
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...