Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/22/2021 in all areas

  1. you have an anime SS girl as your profile pic, claim that the only reason people have a bad view of WW2 Germany is because of American and British propaganda, and have a serious/delusional overestimation towards the quality of German equipment. as they say, if it walks like a duck and honks like a duck, its probably a duck.
    5 points
  2. The sheer existence of the Lost Cause myth should lay the "history is written by the victors" idea to rest. Since you do seem to be a fan of WWII Germany, you should know that much of the US military's historical manuscripts on the Soviet-German war were written by Fritz Halder. This is the former general who wrote the evil Commissar Order... unsurprisingly, he is the source of many discredited "Clean Wehrmacht" myths. In regard to German warships, Koop and Schmolke are excellent sources, and they served in the German WWII navy. They specifically point out the atrocious reliability o
    5 points
  3. 4 points
  4. Techs Each tech consists of the following: Name Type Year. The speed of researching a tech will be faster if behind this or slower if ahead. There is a random factor, but I don't expect this to make a huge difference in decision-making most of the time. Difficulty. The "cost" of the tech. Effect. Each tech either unlocks a component or gives some passive effect(s). Tech types Techs are organized into types: Engines: 8 techs at 60 difficulty each. Unlocks engine components. Boilers: 16 techs at 32 difficulty each. Unlocks fuel and boiler
    3 points
  5. I'm a true Italia fascist. Also im an imperialist of the true eastern asianic empire. Gloria Humana Gloria Deus Civilis
    3 points
  6. I mean, the thing is none of this has anything to do with the thread at hand anyways. Also you can't really complain when you started it in the first place with an unneeded comment about how you purposely set up battles with one side having better tech than the other. Then saying germany should get buffs and random things about the moon. Oh well, a bit of excitement i guess before they eventually announce CAP-1. We are, but if you want to de-rail a thread be prepared for people to give you lip about it. If you don't like it, dont post it simple.
    3 points
  7. Nah, at the end of the day she was inferior. If she was superior she would of won end of. The thing is we recognise hood is a meme, but people keep banging on about how bismarck was a great battleship that got sunk by another meme ship, and helped by meme planes that were obsolete at that point. Yeah shes a nice ship, but she isn't a good as most think she was. The germany navy was a joke at the time in capable of even having both ships up and running at the time. Not too mention getting blasted by inferior ships.
    3 points
  8. This isn't /his/ or /pol/. This is a forum where we discuss and give feedback on an in-development video game title, discussing gameplay and shooting ideas to make a fun and balanced experience worth buying. If you want to talk about how great German tech was and make it about politics then I'd suggest going to one of those places and keep it off of here.
    2 points
  9. Could be Poe's Law. It's difficult to detect sarcasm online.
    2 points
  10. That I can agree. I firmly believe that in France we must say pain au chocolat and not chocolatine.
    2 points
  11. Hi, great updates to the mod (which I have been using since its very early versions). Loads of fun (I can tell because it gets me cursing pretty regularly- lol)! I wanted to list a few things that look to be very minor problems of the bug type, and I have only noticed them since I updated (I had not updated the mod for nearly a year, so unfortunately these could have been introduced any time since the last version I was using from over a year ago....although I imagine they would have been pointed out by now if they were not very recent). I have wiped the mod and th
    2 points
  12. Shes was so superior she got clapped hard by the inferior.
    2 points
  13. Nice point, I think this would be a great visual improvement Whole compartment system is a little contrived. There's no side compartments, wing spaces, double bottom spaces, etc. Some ships did have boilers and engines in three central rooms, but there were lots of other arrangements!
    2 points
  14. Not trying to further this firestorm, but here is something else to chew on: If you think Germany should get technology buffs because they were supposedly "superior" to everything on earth during WWII, should they be limited to no carriers (if carriers are ever implemented) since they never completed the Graf Zepplin? No ships bigger than Bismarck and Tirpitz since the H-Class was never built? Should they have a cap to how many ships they can build since their entire navy was comparably small to the US, UK and Japanese navies? If you are going to advocate for historical factors impa
    1 point
  15. Lmao, nah, the nazi ships were frankly pretty trash. Like, take the much-admired Bismarck-class. You get a similar displacement to the Littorios for what exactly? Less armor, one less gun, and the same speed? the destroyers were top-heavy, the cruisers had significant stability issues or similar efficiency issues to the battleships, depending on the exact class in question. The only decent ships were the Scharnhorst-class, which were fairly small, and the submarines, which aren't represented at all in this game. As for Imperial Germany, well, they were on approximately the same technological l
    1 point
  16. Messieurs, Il faut que je signale une grosse erreur d’identification de mon côté. C’est très probablement à tort que j’avais identifié le portrait d’un vaisseau de 74 canons nommé "Le Lys" comme celui du vaisseau ex-"Le Polonais", lancé à Lorient en 1808. Par conséquent, je étais également en erreur en ce qui concerne l’identité du commandant de ce vaisseau. Je dois donc donner raison à ceux qui se montraient sceptique quant à mon raisonnement, surtout au "Citoyen" qui était le premier à émettre des doutes. J’avais trés simplement négligé la possibilité qu’il aurait pu exister d’autres va
    1 point
  17. Story Mode, well there’s something in that….....hmm can it be done..... yes, via a 'Journey' system. How a journey system works is by completing achievements, a list, creating a story. Later cut scenes could be introduced and they would activate upon achievements - could be as simple as pictures with voiceovers, like Drachinifel videos. Journey achievements/triggers e.g. Researched tech. Captured ports. Built ships. Achievement e.g. HMS Dreadnought. Trigger: Dreadnought I hull, x5 twin 12” guns, x27 3" secondaries, 20000-21000 tons
    1 point
  18. Just because you disagree with an another's viewpoint doesn't mean someone is a Nazi. Take it to the admins if you have something against it. There are users who have real Nazi servicemen on their avatars and names and users with real flags that are banned in Germany. My avatar has nothing to do with any of that. Refer to my comment here. Regarding what you said that I have "serious/delusional overestimation towards the quality of German equipment" refer to this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
    1 point
  19. Unit hp is stored as a decimal and depending on where rounding occurs you get these of by one errors. I recently made a change so that artillery units would allow the player to top off a missing man, but this unfortunately made the off by 1 instances more common in other places. I'll probably revert the artillery focused change in a future patch and see if a different fix is less disruptive. I'm not able to reproduce what you are describing. The numbers displayed in the armory matched the numbers when assigning a weapon to a unit. Are you sure you weren't seeing the Whitworth infantry
    1 point
  20. AI was always terrible at commanding your ships.
    1 point
  21. Greetings Admiral! We plan to add more graphics settings in the future
    1 point
  22. Dev’s are also very much aware that Custom Battles is played by every single player, especially for those who seek historical content. They must know relaxing its development wouldn’t go down well. Players would be (and are) anticipating both the campaign and Custom Battles saves as indicated in January's roadmap.
    1 point
  23. While I also enjoy seal-clubbing and ROFLstomping lower tech level ships in custom battles with my massive 18" gun armed ultra battleship from whatever nation I choose, this game is far from being a "historically accurate" or "realism simulator" game...which is why any argument of "inferior/lower quality ships and tech" holds little to no weight. When it comes to this game, what is inferior/lower quality has to do more with whether or not you pick the best available upgrade/module for your ship and less to do with something like "The German Navy had better equipment than the Royal Navy and exc
    1 point
  24. When I do custom battle I manage it by building my German or French battleship in 1940 and setting the Enemy ship to 1925 technology. (Which is in my opinion historically realistic considering how horrible and inferior any British or American ship was compared to German quality and technology.)
    0 points
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...