Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/11/2020 in all areas

  1. This is bait. Not only is it bait, but it's prime bait. Whether I play World of Warships or not shouldn't particularly matter, and it doesn't to me - but, you made the insinuation that I wasn't a naval nerd. Now, I'm no naval strategy nerd like you types - I focus on the technical aspects. But that point stands, and so I'm going to accept. On to your points. In answer to 1. - I invite you to view their video on the Project 23-type battleship Sovetskii Soyuz, which is what I was referencing when I spoke of 'Russian propaganda', which could more correctly be termed 'Soviet propaganda'.
    8 points
  2. and people need to stop overreacting to us making jokes about the update still not being released. win win
    5 points
  3. HOLY CRAP. I just want to say THANK YOU. You guys made the TW series bearable. I am SO GLAD that I bought this game now, at least I was able to repay you a bit for all the great work you did for free in TW. You guys ROCK
    5 points
  4. Given the postings in the "Great Battle Result" thread are often overlooked and get lost in the sheer amount of posting. I figured it might be cool to have a thread to collect all the Port Battle Data. This thread is going to be 100% non biased. Pure information will be posted. And as this is part of the Club section, if needed I'll make use of the ability of deleting posts and possibly even edit them. If you are feeling a post is biased, react using the "sad smiley" face please. STARTED: 09.03.2020 Danmark Dutch France Great Britain Pirates Poland Prussia Russia Spain Sw
    4 points
  5. ok - since you seem to display the mental agility of a small sea mollusk perhaps putting it into pictures might help the timers that are of interest to YOU are set for YOUR timeframe now STFU and produce less drama and more results
    4 points
  6. I can't believe it's still going. the amount of salt spitting is absolute nonsense now. time for folks to stfu and fight in battles. I'd like to actually hear about the following wars: Pirates vs US GB vs Prussia France vs US incursion
    4 points
  7. Guys, the team needs a little more time for testing. We want to make sure that the new damage system is not containing any bugs. Thank you a lot for your patience!
    4 points
  8. Yea Is she going or coming? XD Anyway I love these ships. They are weird, so am I 😃
    3 points
  9. I want an AAR screen so I can see how much damage blocked/done my ships did. Otherwise, this game is going in the direction I want it too.
    3 points
  10. You had 149 rep points, so I gave you another one. Now it's 150. Congratulations.
    3 points
  11. Ask the Spanish. The ACTUAL reason they lost remedios was because they insisted on a campaign of multi flips and no shows against us. rediii paints a different picture of course, but as usual a false one. He fails to mention all the spanish alts in the sweden.
    3 points
  12. I don't want to be mean but... Guys, if you want to talk about that, go to this part of forum: https://forum.game-labs.net/forum/187-shipyard-discussions-ship-designer-warships-and-their-components/ This topic is about upcoming update, not about historical discussions
    3 points
  13. You mean it was coincedence they flipped Sisal together with you? Damn russian propaganda...
    3 points
  14. Тогда пропадает интрига по поводу френча и пробил/не пробил, и так на мачты жалуется половина сервера. Слишком просто сбить мачту, слишком быстрая и легкая победа выходит. Ваше предложение лишь облегчает жизнь тому кто будет ломать мачту, а запрос вроде ровно противоположный у большинства игроков.
    3 points
  15. Yep. All I want here is Alpha-5. Not arguments.
    3 points
  16. I really don't care to bat around accusations about WG's level of Russia bias around, I'm sure that conversation's been had exhaustively around the internet, but in regards to your second and third points... There is plenty of information available as to what the VMF and Soviet government were intending to achieve pre-war, and how those actually turned out. The idea that someone writing in 2020 wouldn't possibly have read about that and couldn't possibly know what they were talking about is very presumptive, especially given the number of books that have been published on the subject. I
    3 points
  17. 1. Belarusian company with head office in Cyprus is not a "Russian company". But one of its many offices is located in Russia, yes... yet 4 offices are in the USA. So, the very notion of "Russian propaganda" is utterly absurd. But I suppose in WoWs community, to which you obviously belong, it doesn't matter - so long as it can be used as a justification for "Russian bias" as a reason for the game's flawed balance and questionable content. 2. Notion of "pre war technology not being up to the task" mat sound reasonable, but at its core it is also absurd. The ships were in very early stages
    3 points
  18. Интересно послушать очередные версии произошедшего........
    2 points
  19. something like rule the waves but far prettier and moar tabs for info.
    2 points
  20. I want lots of pre-dreadnought hulls. And not only battleship hulls of cours. I would love to see more armoured, protected cruiser hulls. More torpedo boat designes. Oh and of course, those huge, strange french BB hulls. They are so steampunky.
    2 points
  21. I want a lot of DD hulls, superstructures and other stuff to be in v6. DDs need some (a lot) of love.
    2 points
  22. Too be honest in this day and age watching people trying to wait for things or expecting things too be exactly what they want from day one (even whinging about it when they are testing said product out), is pretty astonishing, but not surprising. Either way all we can do is wait, im sure they still have things to iron out first and i'd rather have a patch out that isn't riddled to hell with bugs, most patches have been very stable and quite clean besides some glaring issues that seem to get solved in most updates. Also people saying this community is rough, hilarious try, the warthun
    2 points
  23. You can do alpha’s, just don’t have any expectations! 🙂 Only those who 'expect' the ship to sink "jump".
    2 points
  24. Like babies when they see all the colourful sweets. oh and their ears appearing in orbit around jupiter.
    2 points
  25. I JUST WANT TO SEE IF MY RICHELIEU IS THE NEW HULL FFS LET ME HAVE MY BAGUETTES DAMN IT!!!!
    2 points
  26. i like that you got so mad you drew a diagram
    2 points
  27. Everytime I read these messages i'm baffled of the amount of time people invest into this game xD
    2 points
  28. Keep spreading shit, my friend. 1) you didn't want us to win at Pasaje otherwise you would have sent your CABAL guys (very good I must admit) to defend Fort Baai instead. Which wasn't the case, right? And in any case you would have taken useless and redeemable ships instead of 1st rates... 2) We are friendly with Russia because they are friendly with us. You weren't friendly with us and we attacked you. 3) If you wanted to fight Russia without being hypocrite you would've never left Denmark in the first place (after asking for reduction of BR in PBs, while in sweden you ask for the exa
    2 points
  29. yes we're cowards because we moved a lot closer to our enemy. Makes sense. You pretend to care for the health of the server?? We fight you because we don't like you! That is an honest answer in contrary to your never ending hypocrisy.
    2 points
  30. #freeDeRuyterCompensation
    2 points
  31. A thing I want to see: When I am about to close a port and the game ask me if I REALLY wanna do it even if I lose everything and I have to enter a code it still tells me that it can't be done because I have a cutter or something in it. I know there is a cutter. I've been asked if I really wanna close it and I am aware that I will lose everything which means also my ship(s) and I still have to enter a code. What's the point in doing all this stuff just to deny closing a port because there is stupid ship in it I don't need and have been asked before if I really wanna do it and entered a cod
    2 points
  32. Again, could be wrong....the only Cabo Rojo battle KoC and some of WO were in was the one ironically enough....during EU times. Which I believe they lost. The 2nd attack on Rojo at night was a Russian no show and I'm told WO was not in or on the roster for that PB. Point being, if the goal was to create content for the evening swedes......it's not working. It would appear that the most content the US tz players have had has been during EU times. And I don't particularly care one way or another about the timers, I simply enjoy the hypocrisy of them and the lame excuses like "creating conte
    1 point
  33. thats good an all but, can they hurry up, before I die of a heart attack from the anticipation XD
    1 point
  34. Whats worse, danes trolling swedes on the forum or you making a forum alt specifically to interact with them. Seems like you take all of this more seriously than you should.
    1 point
  35. Just 2 simple questions. What do you want the ship designer to be like in the future? (For example, how restrictive do you want part placement to be) And do you feel like the designer will be updated anytime in the near future? For me personally I would want complete freedom for where stuff can be placed on a hull. I could see some players who play this game for more of its realism not being a fan of that so maybe make a setting that controls how much restrictive it is on placing stuff. Sorry for any poor grammar or spelling.
    1 point
  36. I think @HusariuS gave a really gud example of how we should have a line on the hull to place the superstructures anyway along the hull up to the where bow and aft is of the relevant ship, some even suggested to even move superstructures to the sides of ship and other crazy stuff (that i like lol). Also i would like to see the innards moved around as well which could cause bonuses and/or penalties like topside does atm. Also gib 19-22inch guns pls.
    1 point
  37. how mystery goo is made :3
    1 point
  38. I know but I still want them
    1 point
  39. There was one time I was doing a hard turn to port and my flooding increased dramatically, then when I straightened my course up it seemed to come back under control. Don't know if this was a case of above waterline damage dipping below the surface in the hard turn.
    1 point
  40. Let's re-iterate. You started lecturing others in a condenscending tone, and now you are also the first to pull out? Despite me openly saying (back yesterday) that I am not interested in arguments with armchair engineers/captains/admirals/whatever you call yourself... How typical. Lol. While I am still not arguing whether Pr.23 were great ships or not, I must point out that proofs must prove something specific. Your facts could indeed be used as proofs, if we were arguing something else. But all I am saying is that Pr.23, with this many flaws (alleged or real) was never completed, and the
    1 point
  41. Esteros and Conttoy is also close to Cartagena i guess ??
    1 point
  42. Japanese Cruisers of the Pacific War by Lacroix and Wells is superb. Appendix H gives a fine history of Japanese propellants, from black powder to 1945. Campbell's Naval Weapons of World War Two has great information on propellants of the seven major navies: UK, US, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, and Russia.
    1 point
  43. Real life threats are against game rules and Steam Eula. Appropriate actions are taken.
    1 point
  44. hope we get la galissonaire, cleveland, brooklyn, agano, dido, emile bertin, condottieri, Town, zara, baltimore, takao, kent, mogami.
    1 point
  45. or bitterballs (bitterballen), stroopwafel etc etc etc
    1 point
  46. Ok my ideas are the following: Guns up to 20-22inches to recreate super yammato and the H classes better. Armour tabs for each section of armour could have a drop down menu to into further depth with what sections of the ship are armour to what degree so for example the belt could be divided into 4 sections upper belt, mid belt, lower belt and underwaterbelt which would allow for either all parts of the ships belt to be armour uniformaly or to armour certain sections more than others like in real life. Ability to lengthen and widen the hull, ability to add torpedo bulges onto sh
    1 point
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...