Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/12/2019 in all areas

  1. 5 points
    Hey, I was just curious to see how many of us would like NPC traders to engage and try to fight us in battle... the La Gross Venture for instance just runs away instead of fighting if it has a crew advantage... my suggestion is as follows... Lets have the NPC traders be aggressive until we "break" the moral of the crew by killing off say... 50% of their crew... then the trader tucks tail and runs... But until then the trader will fight … not unlike a warship... and will vie for position to get good shots off at their attackers. After all their guns are there to shoot with... Assuredly, these traders would fight to defend their freight. Please post any ideas you all may have I am interested to see what our forum thoughts are regarding this. P.S. I do understand that something like this was probably talked about before release.. but would it be too much content to add this? Three cheers for the frigates and their gallant Captains!
  2. 4 points
    I disagree, mainly because limits on the market are a bad idea. However, rum should be bountiful at all admiralty shops. Repairs too.
  3. 3 points
    The topic will be updated once investigation is complete
  4. 2 points
  5. 2 points
    Si tan poco crédito tiene no se por que le haceis tanto caso... Y Lobogris, no se por que te molesta tanto que se hayan ido a los Rusos como para andar opinando y si no has jugado en esa facción no deberías hacerlo...cada uno que haga lo que quiera. España Chernovil? Para uno que justo compra el juego si, para ti o cualquiera que haya jugado un poco no debería... Y aunque reconozco que en España hay algunos indeseables (como en todas partes), creo que tb hay buena gente. Que os fuerais ne parece genial, cada uno es libre y os deseo lo mejor, pero a veces sois muy pesimistas y críticos con el futuro de la facción de la que ya no formais parte... En fin, que otra vez se ha ido el Topic...resolved vuestras diferencias a cañonazos como debe ser 😋
  6. 2 points
    Don't argue with a Frenchman about language, because he will beat you elegantly, blind-folded and with hands tied on his back.
  7. 2 points
  8. 2 points
    Delivery missions and trade trips become very tedious after a while. Why not make them more interesting? The occasional floating barrels/chests/wreckage, containing worthwhile, varied booty would be one suggestion. The sighting of these could be announced by a shout from the ship's lookout. Also, port-to-port trading should be made more profitable, in my opinion, so that once again, it becomes a worthwhile pursuit.
  9. 2 points
    I recently purchased the loodsman from the admiralty.... I will report back. Bear in mind, however, that OW speed is roughly doubled from battle instances... So what is 1.25% of ~32? Enough to catch that ship that was just barely faster than you? Not sure yet. Will test.
  10. 2 points
  11. 2 points
    I want to be able to choose my battles and not be subjected to unwanted attacks. For this reason, I play exclusively on the Peace server, now. I wouldn't mind PVP, if I could opt for "PVP battles by mutual consent only".
  12. 2 points
    Bueno precisamente al que deja el juego por frustración no le veo comprando un DLC para cambiar de Faccion... Facil los Rusos? Yo solo veo un monton de sus banderas pero eso a mi no me dice nada, no he jugado con ellos asi que sin saber no opino... Y no os empecéis a calentar que se pierde el topic! 😂
  13. 2 points
    Los insultos sobran... Y en un servidor pvp es absurdo que le pidas a un enemigo combatir en ciertas condiciones... A mi entender la patroll la hicieron para promover y agrupar el pvp, no para sacar medallas por hacer dmg...dentro o fuera del circulo que mas da? Pero lo principal es el respeto...y ponerse asi por ser Tageado...hay algunos que se olvidan de que esto es un JUEGO. Si no sabes jugar con otros niños no juegues 😉
  14. 2 points
    ... I'm not an AFK fisherman but I also fish while traveling because I need the provisions for crafting and like the gambling to get a sealed bottle. I remember the time of the introduction of fishing in the game ... and the big afk fishing fleets in front of the ports ... and their raiders In my opinion the fishing mechanics is ok and need no change ... but Pleaese make salt great angain! ... that means ... salt was a important economic factor of this time period and it shouldn't be useless as now
  15. 1 point
    I have noticed some changes with missions and their rewards. Can we please get some information about these stealth changes? Thank you
  16. 1 point
    Waiting for server to come up again after maintenance i was thinking how nation population could become more balanced, more equally spread among the nations. Then i put my self in a position of someone who is playing in a populated nation and want to choose to a more challenging experience by trying out a not very populated nation. I checked the map and realized that 55 port point ports are simply not enough. If someone for example wants to change from Russia to Spain lets say not many options are available in order to build up an economy since no 55 port is available close enough to capital . So my suggestion is this. Bring more 55 port points ports close or fairly close to capitals. This would probably make people switching nation less of a punishment and challenging.
  17. 1 point
    For some time now I have been watching clan KLIN with Cano Macareo. In recent days, I have often seen battles between a Swede and a Russian. Oddly enough, they always took place right in the harbor and the starting point of the weaker party was always on the land. Mostly a 1st rate was involved which I could see from the BR. Today I was able to enter the battle on the Russian side before it closes and see who was in the battle. As you can see on the screenshots, the players [HAN] Ans and [KLIN] u117 were in the battle. These players i have been watching for days working together across the borders of nations, even abusively by reopen closed battles, allow the opponent (Ganker) to enter and disappear immediately. Anyway, today's battle showed that they did not even think about fighting, but did not fire a shot at each other. Instead, even [HAN] Ans fired at me, which was clear green on green. I suggest a painful demotion, because here we have players who have shown up several times in the game and also tribunal with unfair and abusive behavior. They gain unfair advantage ("power leveling") and when caught, they show even more clearly that they shit on the rules (green on green). By the way: please change the RoE because it is extremely frustrating when a player with Alt in another nation can open closed battles and the normal player stand in front of a locked door ... The incident was around 3pm GMT and I made an F11 error message. I also have more screenshots. o7 Gilles
  18. 1 point
    I started a battle against a Traders Brig in my gunboat during the battle both myself and the TBrig became beached. Another pirate who joined the battle after me in a Privateer stayed at range from the TBrig while firing at it's rigging eventually demasting it. After which he moved in closer to me and proceeded to fire into my broadside sinking me.
  19. 1 point
    При последнем патче увеличилось кол-во необходимых построек для добычи ресурсов (например: Teak/White Oak/Live Oak и т.д.) при покупке DLC Admiralty Conneection добавляется всего-лишь 5 зданий - этого не хватает, так как надо добывать дополнительные ресурсы, а это необходимость строить дополнительно здания для их добычи + строить верфь + академию + строительство пушек. Может стоит сделать в данный DLC 10 разрешений на строительство зданий (как минимум), мне кажется что покупая DLC, аккаунт в игре должен чувствовать себя комфортно и строить одним аккаунтом всё, что необходимо в полном объеме.
  20. 1 point
    Pense que estabas preparando un gankeo de esos que te gustan, respecto a meterme para ver quien era... Muy de maruja lobo xD
  21. 1 point
    Voilà pour toi, ignorant, deux fameux alexandrins : "Ah! Je te casserai la tête assurément. Si tu ne veux, maraud, t'expliquer autrement."
  22. 1 point
    Captains, for chat abuse cases please use in-game "Report" and "Ignore" functions (right click on a player name next to the abusive chat line)
  23. 1 point
  24. 1 point
    Eso es mentira, querido despe a todos dices que clase de persona eres, resulta increíble que ni si quiera me menciones, se te tenia que caer la cara de vergüenza.
  25. 1 point
    listen dude, if you want to tribunal, then tribunal, don't break tribunal rules by commenting on one that has nothing to do with you. just because your a little salty that you failed ganking. ofc looking at how many tribunals are open I don't think devs even do look.
  26. 1 point
    No, we do not need more mods to be put on ships, we need equal ships for challenging battles. These mods will give you an advantage, for sure, and increases your fun while it decreases the fun of your opponent. If there must be mods in this game, they should only be slightly changing the ships stats to keep the fun in battles for both sides. So in my opinion, everything bigger than 0.5% is too much.
  27. 1 point
    La verdad que el juego es mucho más sencillo y divertido cuando te rodeas de gente competente, a la par la gente aquí usa sus mejores barcos ya que si lo pierdes ya vendrá otro buen barco... Mucho más fácil que jugar con gente que sólo usa dlc y que le falta Caribe para huir.
  28. 1 point
    la pena es que las cañoneras no puedan llevar de 24lbs o de 32lbs como solian llevar en la vida real
  29. 1 point
    it works for battle now too? if so then price is expensive, however, in no circumstances ever, I repeat, ever, buff this. thx
  30. 1 point
    Solo he visto a ese señor pocas veces querido alucard osea na de na, además miente por que si tuvimos una batalla en inferioridad en el mismo bando y el llevando un Bellona en la que vencimos, pero de tal señor tal lacayo, debe ser divertidísimo jugar al modo fácil del juego que os dure mucho.
  31. 1 point
    Das läuft dann so, dass du die Dublonen investieren musst und 24h später kannst du die Ressourcen im Warehouse dann abholen (musst du im Hafen dann aktivieren, damit die Ressourcen ausgeschüttet werden). Es hilft, wenn man entweder einen Aussenposten dort hat oder genug Laderaum, um das Zeux dann auch abtransportieren zu können. In einem Rutsch, denn mit Verlassen des Hafens werden sonst die verbleibenden Ressourcen gelöscht. Grüße, Allons!
  32. 1 point
    Danke! Mal sehen ob ichs finde:)
  33. 1 point
    They are towns that make up the capital region, to attack the towns you need to take the capital first.
  34. 1 point
    Buy contracts can already not be placed on trade goods, and that seems to work well. I do trading and can always get trade goods at shop prices, where as players can't seem to help inflating prices by nearly 30x. In a functioning free market, some time or labor would have to be added to the rum in order to increase the price, i.e. sailing it to a different port or something.
  35. 1 point
    Thanks to you all. I’m pleased to advise I have been in action for the first time. I decided to use the tutorial first. I passed the gunnery part and decided to take my cutter out to learn to handle her. By chance (I assume). In the distance I saw two ships. I used my telescope but could not from the distance make out much detail. I decided to close in and see what was going on. I again used my telescope and could make out two ships of a reasonable size. I then saw yellow flashes from one and could also see it was French. As yet unable to see who it was firing out. As I moved closer I saw it was a ship of his majesty’s Royal Navy. Both ships were 2 deckers and I could see they were engaging. Rightly or wrongly (not sure if it’s ok to do so). I decided to help my fellow countryman even if I only had a cutter. It was proving difficult to position myself to fire without the risk of hitting my own countrymen. Great luck I had just done the gunnery tutorial. I fired a ranging shot but couldn’t see where it had gone due to the smoke from my gun. I decided to move in closer. But wanted to be able to attack the French stern. I wasn’t keen on receiving a broadside ! I had now caught the attention of the Frenchman as I received some damage. Hopefully this would help my countryman. I closed and managed to fire at the stern. Despite the smoke I could see I was causing some damage. I was at least starting to help cause the Frenchman problems. With the 2 to 1 odds even if I only had a cutter. The battle went on for sometime. I was alarmed to discover how long it took me to reload ! A sharp learning curve. I spent a lot of time manoeuvring and firing the occasional broadside. Thankfully the British captain seemed to know his trade. The Frenchman started to suffer serious damage and I felt able to move in closer. Another broadside by the British captain and the Frenchman started to sit lower in the sea. The engagement was won. The British ship sailed off. I decided I needed target practice. So I stayed until the Frenchman sunk. I then sailed away feeling rather smug. Also having learned some lessons at the sharp end. What a great game ! Can’t wait till I know what I am doing 🤔. Cheers all 🍻
  36. 1 point
    Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts is a completely separate project. We are sorry for no news but that does not mean we are not progressing. We will offer the game in early form within 2019, and we are going to give more information about it ASAP.
  37. 1 point
    Ban for that?, might aswell ban whole server... that was nothing😉 Don't get me wrong, the guy is obviously an idiot, but.. this community's standards are far lower.
  38. 1 point
    AFK fishing is not against the rules. Find them and sink them like a real captain would do with slowly moving sleeping captains in that era. Not everyone should report, salute you or wake up just because you got to your keyboard.. Locked
  39. 1 point
    Ech, now timers will change to night, and WO will take it instead
  40. 1 point
    https://ibb.co/k0WDV7G fake news
  41. 1 point
    I do not get how the alliances feature would help the OP issue (he needs safe zone or aggressive AI), but anyway: I would like to have the alliance feature reintroduced to the game, in a modified and limited way. So nations can only ally to one other nation. And we avoid the big chain/blob alliances we had (server basically had 2 nations because of the previous alliance system). Anti Zerg measures is also needed. So the nations with the most ports and the nation with the most players should be excluded form entering into alliances with other nations. If a nation that is in an alliance become the biggest port owner or gets the most players, that nations should be forced to leave it's alliance.
  42. 1 point
    I am shaken, he is a good clan friend. Since he has always come across as a good person for me. I can hardly believe it. I apologize in the name of [PURG3] for this behavior!
  43. 1 point
    If RoE is meant to help out traders and people being ganked...I don't understand why they don't just make it unlimited join time for the person being tagged and a 2 min timer for the tagger once tagger's side has higher BR.
  44. 1 point
    AI needs to be turned down about 30%. No joke. It's utterly retarded how buffed you've made them.
  45. 1 point
    Seriously - you guys need to review AI capabilities. There is such thing as balance. I've been playing a long time and this happened before with the result that players left - I can already see a gradual decline in numbers. Its very difficult for newer players (and seasoned players, I might add) to cap ai ships now - let alone defeat them. Not much fun anymore.
  46. 1 point
    Just the ships you craft in PvE are worthless unless it is a trader. Thanks for making PvE an empty box other than to play Naval UPS delivery man. 3+yrs of testing for you, waiting and you completely trash PvE, pre-release and during release with the NPC buffs pre-release, then add insult to injury, nerf players books by 60%+ and ship upgrades. Meanwhile keeping the blatant cheating OP NPC's at release. Bravo, way to go treating your PvE player base like this. Enjoy the steam reviews, they are deserved and obviously ignored
  47. 1 point
    all ports that can be captured on the pvp server have better production quality chance on the pve server too
  48. 1 point
  49. 1 point
    привет товарищи я согласен с тобой, возникает проблема, что игра становится больше, но DLC остается с емкостью. нам нужно не только больше форпостов, но, разумеется, когда вы строите здания, вам нужно больше часов, чтобы эффективно использовать игру в сочетании с текущим DLC. В прошлом я уже предлагал связать рабочее время со зданием. чтобы вы не столкнулись с нехваткой рабочей силы по сравнению с DLC и обычным пользователем игры. у кого такие же часы необходим новый взгляд на эффективность DLC по сравнению с текущим новым добавленным контентом. но следует также учитывать, когда текущие значения LH (часы) остаются неизменными в соответствии с потреблением часов здания DLC не имеет добавленной стоимости, пока ограничение LH (часы) остается тем же. и количество аванпостов остается прежним. хотя этот DLC лучший в игре
  50. 1 point
    Apparently I have to go back to sea trials to relearn how to sail a Lynx. The AI Cerebus I was fighting yesterday could turn on a dime and keep me from raking it. But then again... Sea Trials would probably not help being an older version?
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...