Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/30/2019 in all areas

  1. Polish player was tagged near La Mona. [BF]Zz1m joined the battle only to increse BR side on the Polish side, so soon after another RUBLI (Agamemnon) joined to the combat, and Zz1M left the combat. Intentionally raised the OW limit and left the battle without a shot fired.
    12 points
  2. Tonight before server reset (5/1 @ 5:08) a French Alt in the US nation opened multiple hostility missions for San Mateo for the only purpose of allowing French clan WO to enter instead and run up hostility and set PB at Mateo. This is an exploit and is using an alt to run up hostility in contrast with the stated rules and allowable uses of alts. Please investigate the player who opened the the hostility missions for a foreign nation. The PB should also be cancelled.
    10 points
  3. Bit too far there. - H. Darby
    8 points
  4. Thank you Sparkydog for bringing this up! The great idea of frontlines and capital ports is foiled by this misuse of ALTs. All players that participated in that should be warned to get banned and the PB should be liquidated. I am so fed up with this loop hole using.
    8 points
  5. Dear Dev's Please install a map link in Delivery Missions Window under the port name of destination, so that the map will pop up showing the the harbour where the goods and persons have to be shiped to. That will save typing "M", clic on Ports and County search, typing the name of the destinated port, click on it when found and all the clicks to close Map. In the name of comfort please think about that. Thanks for reading!
    6 points
  6. NA community can be toxic but of all online communities, one of the best.
    5 points
  7. Could you imagine what would have happened if LV or Banished did what Reverse pulled yesterday and streamed it live? Would be an admin led public execution here on the forums. But since it's the golden boy....nothing happens. Only those that are critical get punished.
    5 points
  8. Nassau PB Thanks Brits, for your enthusiasm in grinding Nassau on day one. It saved us from doing this against AI.
    4 points
  9. Here we go again . The devs told us what we will get new paints after 30 days of release of the DLC . Where are them ?
    4 points
  10. There is There is no drama, just rules. If the rules are still in force, the conclusion is clear. The PB should be cancelled. The ALT should be dealt with according to the rules. Where is the drama?
    4 points
  11. Предложение по поводу управления городом. По умолчанию у города должны быть заблокированы все ячейки инвестиций, а у главы клана право разблокировать определённые, чтобы контролировать ветки развития. Это позволит защититься от "доброхотов" и максимально эффективно потратить очки развития, так как на всё их не хватает.
    3 points
  12. well after the xp at release drama ... and the subsequent fall out lets see what they do ... im guessing that a lot of players motivation to carry on playing will depend on the result do they follow their own rules or change them yet again ??
    3 points
  13. 3 points
  14. It's all on the other thread. I'm not even sure why there are two threads on this. You're correct, the PB should be cancelled and if it were me, I would use the in-game email system to warn all players that an exploit has been identified and will be corrected, and that any players who use in in the meantime will be elbow smashed, etc.
    3 points
  15. I don't understand all the drama over this. It's clearly an exploit that devs have already acknowledged and identified the possible solutions. For me, i'm shocked that it's not obvious. The clan who initiates the hostility will be the port owner. It's not even about alts, frankly. I could ask a friend in another nation to do the same thing for me.
    3 points
  16. Ahoy captains and devcaptains! I've been playing this game for about 200 hours and I must say it is a lovely game. I enjoy the thing you can do with the free camera but I would like to propose a feature request that I think may be achievable in the near future. Currently in game - It is not a big issue but we all know that when we scroll in, we end up kinda on deck but somewhere in the middle of the ship, floating near the mainsail. Feature request - My request is that to zoom in but instead of stopping where it is, it can be default zoom into the helm of the s
    2 points
  17. When trading with a player at sea the message regarding trading is send in the language of the player who started the trade. Its even shown to the other guy. When we get more chinese or even russians it will be hard figure out what this chat is all about. Trade request should be displayed in the language of each user. When I use german localization and I trade someone with the english version, he still should get an english message.
    2 points
  18. Bring back the 3 minute timers for BOTH sides. This drama doesn't happen
    2 points
  19. They are the experts for exploiting every mechanic,so no need to argue, also expert in crying in tribunals. We know them, we know them well, do we need to keep discussing, I do not think so. Problem is flawed ROE, there are big problems with this ROE.
    2 points
  20. Rubbish! You know the mechanics of the BR-difference exactly Pirates in Santa Cecilla (200) & USS (400) attacked a Polish Trinco (270) ==> Reinforcement for the polish is possible, Pirate side is closed after timer counts Russian Player Bellona (500) joined on polish side ==> BR on polish side is now higher than on Pirate Side and because of the third Party battle opens again for Pirate side after the pirate Aga (340) joined battle is instantly closed for both sides => No Reinforcement is possible You are the guy that's crying for punishments of ot
    2 points
  21. That is exactly the issue. The battle was Santa Cecilia + USS (600) vs 270 The Agamemnon would not be able to join the fight, if Zz1m wouldn't increase (artificially) the BR on Polish side. He joined JUST AFTER, the BF member raised Polish side BR from 270 to 770
    2 points
  22. As there are still so many port battles scheduled, some of them are not shown on the map. This is due to the limit of 100 tweets that the map bot can access through the standard Twitter api. Results of (most of) the port battles are shown though.
    2 points
  23. 2 points
  24. Forgot to mention (thanks oldcrankyman for reminder) We thought for a very long time of a system that will allow us to identify alts who are exploiting hostility mechanics Some systems involved counting surrenders and limiting surrenders after a certain limit, other systems were based on damage vs kills vs kills in other ares. Many ideas were discussed but they all affected normal players in one or another way.. After careful deliberations we did not want to limit gameplay of normal players (because all systems and limitations will limit normal people in some or another way). So we hav
    1 point
  25. The book is a component in the recipe. Crafting consumes the book to create the upgrade.
    1 point
  26. This club has not gotten some love in a while. The stages of loss when loosing multiple fights to a Indiaman on a trade run. (No iron was harmed in the making of this.)
    1 point
  27. I wonder why the British top team did not go to Nassau .... Fear ???
    1 point
  28. по поводу портовых инвестиций - поддержу Парамона заблокировать по дефолту ячейки инвестиций, открыть только для лидера клана + сделайте пожалуйста систему отката инвестиций (например, порт на 20к БРа, если поставить 2 форта, 2 башни, вкачать все линейки кораблестроения в топ - 4 и одну линейку в 1 - было бы неплохо снести например одну башню (ненужную как ты считаешь) и влить оставшиеся 2 портовых поинта во 2ую ячейку линейки кораблестроения), да и вообще система сноса через крестик лидеру клана нужна
    1 point
  29. Or maybe just take away that TOTALLY USELESS feature that hides players' names in OS.
    1 point
  30. La speranza è l'ultima cosa che è persa. 😉
    1 point
  31. No - it's the lamb in nappies that lost his soother🤣
    1 point
  32. Sad truth is ur so right and until admin addresses there so called golden children, we all just have to deal with it or quit or better still pray that release is successful
    1 point
  33. reverse wasnt the first to do it. Cornelis made a post and a F11, than reverse saw it and use it
    1 point
  34. Salut, Merci pour les retours. Les augmentations de stats seront revues de manière globale d'ici peu. Je ne sais pas quel sera l'équilibre proposé entre port, bois, upgrades, manuels et perks. Apparemment les premiums ne bénéficient pas des bonus de port. Pour les alts il n'y a pas grand chose à faire malheureusement. Même dans PotBS du temps de l'abonnement, certains joueurs avaient plusieurs comptes. Je crois qu'une alliance de petits clans peut faire aussi bien qu'un gros clan. Pour les joueurs, on verra la rétention à la sortie, à l'accès anticipé le RvR a duré 6 mois. De to
    1 point
  35. Relief found for victims of RvR exploit
    1 point
  36. Along with that piece of advice, Save the game frequently. This will allow you to do a whole series of 'what ifs' as you replay portions of the battle. I save at the very beginning of a battle, and at each critical point in the battle.
    1 point
  37. No no no, Los alemanes robaron los planos de los cruceros de batalla británicos que tenían un fallo de diseño en los compartimentos destinados a almacenar los saquetes de pólvora. Esto lo descubrieron los alemanes al sufrir las consecuencias en la batalla del Dogger Bank, en la que el crucero acorazado Blücher fue hundido y el Seydlitz no voló por los aires de milagro. A raíz de esto, los alemanes protegieron adecuadamente estos compartimentos. Los británicos al no sufrir en dicha batalla ningún desastre, no conocieron el error de diseño hasta que volaron por los aires tres de sus cruceros de
    1 point
  38. The long and short of this idea is this: That Regional capitals are expanded ONLY through investment in the other ports of their Region. The problem to solve is that currently only County Capitals matter. All other non-capital ports are inconsequential. To change this, non-capital ports should matter in the conquest of a county, and they should matter in the development of a county. Only through expanding the infrastructure in surrounding ports can the capitals reach their full potential. This is not only prudent gameplay-mechanics, it is also historical. If you neglect the s
    1 point
  39. Я был осведомлен о том, что произошло, и от имени REDS я оговариваю факты, представленные в суде, и приношу свои извинения. Я также организую незамедлительную замену потерянных кораблей и улучшений. Пожалуйста, дайте мне знать, что конкретно было потеряно. Что касается случая: хотя присоединение к сражениям с целью их закрытия не является чем-то, что ранее рассматривалось трибуналом, я согласен, что это должно быть определено как подвиг, и это так же хорошо, как и любая возможность для его решения. Поскольку это первое нарушение рассматриваемого игрока, приоритет заключается в том, что игрок
    1 point
  40. Clearly the revolution was far more complex event than how it is portrayed, at least in British schools. By comparison Great Britain's attempt at republicanism post civil war(s) was a failure, which, led to our current Constitutional Monarchy. Charles I was an absolute Monarch who believed he reigned by divine right, whether Louis XVI believed the same, or not, I do not know, but, as monarchs they held similar traits and took a similar path to their trials and executions. I took you're advice and read a little deeper into the 'old regime', and I think barely scratched the surface of h
    1 point
  41. The real point is that nobody should have to join a clan to get access to any benefits or advantages. Small clans should not have to merge with larger clans or other small clans to make a large clan large enough to get access to benefits and advantages. EVERY player - REGARDLESS of clan membership - should have equal access to the SAME benefits and advantages of every other player. EVERY player should be able to set up their OP production buildings and shipyard however they want REGARDLESS of whether or not they just happen to belong to a clan large enough to take and hold a particular port
    1 point
  42. 1 point
  43. My 24 hours ban is fair. Maybe for my speech need ban more then 24 hours. But if we say about fair ban than Henry must be banned to . dont think so? Or you prefer say about players who insult in chat and dont say about players who violated game rules?
    1 point
  44. access to game until release. After release it will be unlocked with the hope that the person was reformed or lost interest. only valve can ban a steam account.
    1 point
  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...