Alts for port battles activities - BAN WARNING

[jointventure]

so only alts are the problem wow, so friendly player WTF guy doing hosti, joinend by BF to raise a port is fair play, nice catch admin

[jointventure]

reverse wasnt the first to do it. Cornelis made a post and a F11, than reverse saw it and use it

[Black veil]

that's just laughable, someone post's the bug, fault and then a player admin looks too exploits it , absolutely awesome ;-( 

[Sir Loorkon]

16 minutes ago, Liberalism said:

Nice, so since only the alts are the problem, I will ask 10 of my friends from the US that are no alts to help me with hostility on US ports All nice and legal.

You say there is no drama, but all of this just reminds me of drama with RvR mechanics a year ago when 25 people had to be demoted and week later the mechanic was announced 100% legal.

Why do you mix up things here? And why do you misquote me on purpose that I intended to say only ALTs are a promlem? Of course there should be a change to avoid "friends" doing the same thing ALTs could do. Admin posted a solution to that in the other thread just some hours ago. 

[Dibbler (Retired)]

30 minutes ago, Black veil said:

that's just laughable, someone post's the bug, fault and then a player admin looks too exploits it , absolutely awesome ;-( 

 

 It is test phase so not a big thing, but still no wonder game pop is smaller than Donald Trumps penis.

[Angus MacDuff]

2 minutes ago, Dibbler said:

 

 It is test phase so not a big thing, but still no wonder game pop is smaller than Donald Trumps penis.

You're right about the testing (I will not comment on the other).  This can be easily fixed if Devs take immediate action and we can move on.

Edited April 30, 2019 by Angus MacDuff

[Dibbler (Retired)]

21 hours ago, Angus MacDuff said:

You're right about the testing (I will not comment on the other).  This can be easily fixed if Devs take immediate action and we can move on.

 

 Nothing will happen, no point in pushing subject.

 Is testing, everything will be wiped anyway.

Edited May 1, 2019 by Dibbler

[Socialism]

Could you imagine what would have happened if LV or Banished did what Reverse pulled yesterday and streamed it live?  Would be an admin led public execution here on the forums.  But since it's the golden boy....nothing happens.  Only those that are critical get punished.

Edited April 30, 2019 by Socialism

[shunt]

3 minutes ago, Socialism said:

Could you imagine what would have happened if LV or Banished did what Reverse pulled yesterday and streamed it live?  Would be a admin led public execution here on the forums.  But since it's the golden boy....nothing happens.  Only those that are critical get punished.

well after the xp at release drama ... and the subsequent fall out lets see what they do ... im guessing that a lot of players motivation to carry on playing will depend on the result do they follow their own rules or change them yet again ??

[Black veil]

1 hour ago, Dibbler said:

 

 It is test phase so not a big thing, but still no wonder game pop is smaller than Donald Trumps penis.

So so true 

[Black veil]

58 minutes ago, Socialism said:

Could you imagine what would have happened if LV or Banished did what Reverse pulled yesterday and streamed it live?  Would be a admin led public execution here on the forums.  But since it's the golden boy....nothing happens.  Only those that are critical get punished.

Sad truth is ur so right and until admin addresses there so called golden children, we all just have to deal with it or quit or better still pray that release is successful 

[Sir Loorkon]

...St. Mateo PB just happened. What is the consequence?

 

[Dibbler (Retired)]

27 minutes ago, Sir Loorkon said:

...St. Mateo PB just happened. What is the consequence?

 

 

 Does it really matter, will all be wiped again lol.

 I find all this really amusing now, all the chest beating for taking ports against AI and using bugs,  all the saltiness. 

 It's been hillarious watching grown men act like 5 year olds, I seriously think this all could be a good base for a psychological study.

 Sure i get pissed off also but just go play other stuff for a bit,  go out see friends, chat up women in hope of a sexual encounter etc. ....  lets all get some perspective on how sad all this has become  🤣😂🤣.

 Choose life!

 

 

Edited May 1, 2019 by Dibbler

[Atreides]

17 hours ago, Socialism said:

Could you imagine what would have happened if LV or Banished did what Reverse pulled yesterday and streamed it live?  Would be an admin led public execution here on the forums.  But since it's the golden boy....nothing happens.  Only those that are critical get punished.

Maybe they will dock his twitch payment 10% this week

[Rob4eg]

21 hours ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said:

There are now two other nations with ports on the US coast that have not been taken using the frontlines system.  

the front line is with another nation and another clan. but she IS. what is the problem? what's the difference with whom to fight?

[Rook29]

So after all this talk about being banned if you use this exploit, French clan WO goes and flips Jeremie using the same loop hole tactic. this is a joke because you cannot stop hostilities as easily as you used to. 

[GIBZ]

well, the new front line system and the 2 big nation just close 80% of the map for me, what the WO and others nation did is a maybe  questionable but just made the game still worth playing  for me since it will give me access to PvP at KPR and CharlesTown. If the Devs had change LA NAVASSE and another one in Florida to free-town, like we(the frogs) have in front or FR, the problem had  never occur.

Edited May 1, 2019 by Ptigibus
typos

[Genevieve Malfleurs]

4 hours ago, Dibbler said:

 

 Does it really matter, will all be wiped again lol.

 I find all this really amusing now, all the chest beating for taking ports against AI and using bugs,  all the saltiness. 

 It's been hillarious watching grown men act like 5 year olds, I seriously think this all could be a good base for a psychological study.

 Sure i get pissed off also but just go play other stuff for a bit,  go out see friends, chat up women in hope of a sexual encounter etc. ....  lets all get some perspective on how sad all this has become  🤣😂🤣.

 Choose life!

 

 

sexual encounters aren't as good after the last wipe 😂

[Angus MacDuff]

4 minutes ago, Genevieve Malfleurs said:

sexual encounters aren't as good after the last wipe 😂

Obviously playing the game wrong

[Dibbler (Retired)]

Violation of Rule 16 removed. - H. Darby

Edited May 1, 2019 by Henry d'Esterre Darby

[Black veil]

13 minutes ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said:

Thank you all for offering your opinions - of course, it will be wiped in some weeks' time.  This is not the problem.  The problem is that people have broken the rules of the developers - these rules must be enforced - the coming wipe is of no consequence in the face of the rules of this game.

I completely agree with u but track record says nothing will happen

[Steele OooOoOOoOOOooooOOOO]

On 10/21/2016 at 4:29 PM, admin said:

edited the post

to resonate with wider audience.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              -------------------------------------------------------

[Dibbler (Retired)]

20 minutes ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said:

I cannot quote H. Darby in any topic but this, it seems, so

We keep making new topics because there has been no concrete developer response and the problem is just getting worse.  

 

 I have to admit this is now becoming just another way to create toxicity and unrequired drama by the offenders.

 Devs should act in some way,  otherwise this kind of situation will become "the norm".

I have seen many good games destroyed by unruly/toxic community, and conversly many sub par games still running due to a good community.

All that trolling/griefing continuing will do is create yet another barrier to game sales and server pop issues. I've seen reviews on steam that point out "toxic community yadyadayada", thats not good for game as a whole.

 People should really think about if they want game to succeed or just to use to stroke personal egos and move onto next game when game closes. Lets face it with current pop we are kinda on life support currently,  and if new wave of players doesn't arrive on release i think will possibly be a terminal situation for game which would be a great shame.

 

 

 

Edited May 1, 2019 by Dibbler

[--Privateer--]

9 minutes ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said:

As I say, three US ports have been taken using illegal methods. 

Two Neutral ports have been taken and a third set, but not taken.

12 minutes ago, Sir "The Lorax" John said:

If the developers are rolling out punishments as described in the rules, I would be happier.

You dug up an old rule that doesn't even apply to this situation. This was written in late 2016, there were no hostility missions, hostility was generated through OW fleets and PVP only.

For the period of testing until release using alts to generating hostility is a bannable offence.

When it says "using alts to generate hostility" that is referring to sinking alts in the OW in place of OW AI fleets to put hostility on a port. Which isn't applicable at all to the current situation.

Now can we please stop creating new threads about the same stuff and actually give the devs a chance to make a decision about it?

[Dibbler (Retired)]

1 minute ago, --Privateer-- said:

Two Neutral ports have been taken and a third set, but not taken.

You dug up an old rule that doesn't even apply to this situation. This was written in late 2016, there were no hostility missions, hostility was generated through OW fleets and PVP only.

For the period of testing until release using alts to generating hostility is a bannable offence.

When it says "using alts to generate hostility" that is referring to sinking alts in the OW in place of OW AI fleets to put hostility on a port. Which isn't applicable at all to the current situation.

Now can we please stop creating new threads about the same stuff and actually give the devs a chance to make a decision about it?

 

Ahah!

The OJ Simpson defence .