Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

Pedro Tellez

Ensign
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Pedro Tellez's Achievements

Landsmen

Landsmen (1/13)

7

Reputation

  1. What I´m saying is that with the same ship you get the same xp no matter if in a mission or at a PVP battle....and I think you should get bigger rewards with the same ship at a PVP battle.
  2. Hello, I'd like to know the reason of getting such a little amount of xp points when you finish a PVP battle. It seems very odd to me that if you get 7 PVP marks with a Trinco you only get 300 xp. You get much more doing a mission or sinking an IA. I guess it's much more difficult to sink another player than a IA, at least almost always so the xp reward should be higher, not lower. I think this matter should be corrected specially to reward those who dare to go to a PVP battle with a ship that have not all the ship knowledges fulfilled. Well, I think it's fair. Regards,
  3. Hello again, Now it's a new one but I think is related. I was doing the fleet with two LGV I had captured from IA. When I tried to load cargo in one, the cargo was replicated in the other. Then I've dismissed one of the ships and then both disappeared together along with the crew OF ONLY ONE OF THEM. So, I guess the problem is that for any reason one of my ships was replicated by the IA. IA let me add crew to both, but when I send them to docks the crew of the replicated one simply disappears. The bug of replicating the cargo when loading one of them is new. Hope it helps. Regards, Ps: Please remember this is happening in the account of the player "John Poe John".
  4. It happened again. I made a fleet, then I sail out, check the wind and inmediately get in port and send ship to docks. When I tried to do the fleet again there was 140 missing crew,.... Now there is no doubt at all. And I'll have to hire the crew, AGAIN, to keep playing. It's a quite insistent bug 😉
  5. Please note that this is happening with my second account "John Poe John", not with my main. I've sent an F11 report with that account. I guess you know it but just in case. Regards
  6. As I said, I haven't done anything since I logged off and now.... How can I hire 200 crew if before logging off I had 400? Obviously there is a bug
  7. I moved the ships to docks. I was at my main port. Of course you can't teleport if there is any active fleet in other port and I can teleport. Moreover, before logging off I hired 399 crew to make a trip to MAriel from LH... NOW, when I logged in ...there is 200 crew missing. And in all outpost is the same. I have NOW only 200 crew. And I haven´t done anything since I last hired crew(399)...only logging off. The thing is that no matter WHERE your crew is, the game don´t let you hire crew, or it shouldn't if you have full crew. Isn't it? Regards
  8. Hello, I've been noticing that from time to time my crew simply disappear. I have been trading all morning without doing any battle or engaging any combat and after arriving at port with a trader brig I tried to sail again..to find that I only had one sailor left (Crew: 1) It happened to me before and I reported it but with no luck. But I have to admit that I thought maybe I did not remember everything, and it could be my mistake. But this time, all my crew disappeared (400) and I haven´t been in any battle in all day. Moreover a few hours ago I did a fleet with an Snow (120) and 2 Le gros ventre (140+140)... and I have no problem. I don't know if I'm doing something wrong, but if so, I'd really appreciate if you could tell me what it's. Thanks in advance. Regards,
  9. Perdón, pensaba que el Lynx y el Bellona estaban en grupo. Por lo demás, sigo diciendo lo mismo.... y no voy a decir nada más que para eso están los devs Sorry, I was wrong. I though Lynx and Bellona were grouped. Anyway, I keep all I have said b4 Vaya, ahora sales con que pensabas que el Bellona de Goe y el Lynx de Lupus eran amiguitos e iban juntos y en grupo de la manita. ¿No dices, y mantienes, que los Lupus habíamos cometido "actos poco claros" CONTRA los GOE y que por eso los GOE estaban enfadados (angry)? Aclárate. Por lo menos ya reconoces quien atacó y por tanto validas la reclamación de como pudieron hacer que el pirata atacara al Lynx anulando así la zona de protección....cosa que veo que sigue pareciéndote bien, ya que te reafirmas en tu post anterior. Me parece, que más que el "cazador cazado" del que hablabas, te has convertido en el "alguacil alguacilado". Por favor, sigue "arreglándolo"....y muchas gracias por tu ayuda.
  10. Te voy a contestar en español para así; "no molestar a los devs", ya que tanto te preocupa que puedan trabajar demasiado. No te parece bien que alguien defienda a LUPUS, pero aquí estás defendiendo a tus amigos de GOE y para ello te basas en que, quien defiende a Lupus, "no da la cara". Para ti es fácil darla porque estás, "acudiendo en socorro del vencedor", es decir, del autodenominado "clan más grande de España", como dice su fundador más arriba, pero no te paras a pensar en que el propio Badajo dice que no la da porque está viendo el acoso que Lupus sufre..y que no quiere que le pase a él. Pero tú, como las madres, dices que tus queridos niños nunca harían algo prohibido (they never would do anything forbbiden). También te vas a hacer, como las madres, responsable de sus actos? Sin embargo: - Dices que no te parece bien que alguien use otra cuenta para dar su opinión, pero no parece molestarte que uno de tus amigos escriba aquí con su cuenta normal y con la de su alter. Doble rasero? - Dices que el Trader Lynx atacó a la Consti (como si hubieras estado allí)...¿estás seguro de que eso es posible?(BR 10 vs 250?) En todo caso, estás dejando por mentiroso a juanma675 que reconoce que fue él quien atacó al pirata unos post más arriba. - Dices que el clan GOE tiene buena gente, y no lo pongo en duda. Pero en 4 líneas has llamado "poco honorable" a uno, has dejado por mentiroso a otro, y has afirmado sin ninguna base para sustentarlo, creo que más que tu amistad por ellos que por otra cosa, que un Trader Lynx puede atacar a una Consti y que ellos nunca harían algo prohibido. ¿Está permitido mentir, por ejemplo? Con amigos como tú.... No conozco las motivaciones de Badajo para terciar, pero se las agradezco Y entiendo perfectamente que si está denunciando acoso, no quiera significarse demasiado ante la perspectiva de sufrir el mismo acoso también. Dicho acoso se deduce fácilmente del vídeo y de los comentarios que hacen los protagonistas...y tu defensa de ellos, con tan escaso fundamento, no ayuda precisamente a pensar que dicho acoso no exista...sino que participas en ello. En algo sí estoy de acuerdo...que los devs hagan su trabajo.
  11. Well, I had decided not to intervene in this quarrel since I wanted to follow an old and wise quote from Mark Twain: ““Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.” But obviously I must be some of an idiot since I’m here. My only (poor) excuse is that I don’t want somebody could say: “Silence lends assent”. So, I feel I must speak once to state my point of view, and say something before the Goebbels’s law will be fullfilled. You know; “A lie told thousand times becomes the truth”. I see above that David Weller, aka Capitan Charles Vane, Depredador and Juanma675 are so desperate to justify their actions that they are not respecting any boundary. First of all and for the record, this is the first time I write on this thread and hopefully it will be my last. The reasons are quite simple. - I JUST DON’T NEED TO DO IT. This mates are doing such a nice job with their posts that everything else I could say would be redundant or useless. There is a quote from Abraham Lincoln that is perfect for this matter: “No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar”. And GOE guys have been working really hard to prove this sentence. As I said, I don’t need to give any explanation, David W, his alter Capitan Charles Vane and the rest of GOE’s are giving a different and contradictory version of what have happened around everytime they write here and at other channels. So, as every general (or admiral) knows: “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making mistakes”. I know this is contradictory since I’m interrupting, but I’m starting to feel sad for them, so busy as bees trying to convince everybody in the same way that Groucho Marx once did: “Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?” Pretty lame, so I guess that is just fair to at least point out what they are really doing. Because after what they done (without thinking very much about it, obviously) they are giving us many versions: a)The Trader Lynx attacked the pirate (I was told that’s not possible but never tried) Also that they attacked the pirate (juanmi) but they retreated due to the insults they were receiving. c) AND ALSO that they got into the battle to help (Depredador) and left for the same reason, the insults But the fact is that none of them shoot a single cannon...and none of them tried to scape..being so scared as they were from a single pirate on a Constitution (BR 1050 vs 250). They just stayed there looking until the Trader lynx was sunk. I’m not so gullible to believe that two guys sailing a Bellona and a Victory against a Constitution let scape their PVP marks because a guy in a Trader Lynx was alledgely insulting them. Any of you would do so? Do you want to believe them? Or simply, are you interested in believe so? If you add that the pirate in the Constitution is the alter of David Weller, the leader of the clan GOE, I guess that all you by yourselves can resolve this quiz. - The video is attached, everyone can see it and get their own conclusion. But if anyone still have doubts, I encourage them to read all the different (and contradictory) explanations/versions they are giving here. I guess it will be enough... Thanks a lot Badajo for your statement. I did not expected that anybody could do it. I understand perfectly that you want to remain anonymous since you already have seen how these guys actue. I’d wish there could be any mean to prove that I did not write what you Badajo have wrote. If devs can do it I give them from here my full permission to prove it. Ps: “Be thou as chaste as ice, as pure as snow, thou shalt not scape calumny”. William Shakespeare.
×
×
  • Create New...