Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,336 Excellent

About Quineloe

  • Rank
    Master and Commander
  • Birthday 01/01/1982

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

1,229 profile views
  1. FTLOG please don't start a god damn fake news debate in a patch note thread for a video game +
  2. throughout most of that time, BR was fairly irrelevant. The only downside due to Wasa having way too low BR was insufficient reward generation for PVP. Only when BR limits to PBs were added, the 250 BR became a problem.
  3. Wasa 290 BR as third rate Agamemnon 300 BR as fourth rate Is this intended?
  4. I'm pretty certain they do not. France has 46 ports and 36 points.
  5. I'm still waiting for Admin to explain why in his game Naval Action Legends losers get rewarded for losing when their ship gets replaced for pretty much free, but in this game losing a ship means an hour of replacing everything until you're ready again, and you get absolutely no reward.
  6. So 3 victory marks per week for top dog? that's 300 PVP marks per week. That is quite the golden shower of PVP marks you're giving out there, admin. Maybe 100 to 1 is not the proper exchange course for VM given how much harder it is to obtain PVP marks than combat marks. How many players in your game managed to obtain 300 PVP marks in a single week? Is it zero? I'd like to know if anyone ever managed to get 300 PVP marks in a single week. if Sweden stays on top for another 3-4 weeks, we'll have no idea what to do with all those VMs. And if someone else gets to #1, they'll have no idea what to do with all those VMs after a few weeks. Especially with Alt accounts also getting the x3 reward. I guarantee you that we'll start seeing alt accounts in predetermined port battles to get that one Lord Protector on alts for more VM showers.
  7. and five others who want to take part in this insanity. That's basically why we are not doing them anymore, never six players online who would want to do this long PVE dragon raid.
  8. 1) is literally what it says in the patch notes. Literally 2) nowhere it is said that victory marks are required for 2nd rates. Why would 2nd rates and 1st rates both require a victory mark? no one would ever build second rates ever again.
  9. No, if I had been the only person to shoot these ships, I would have just gotten sunk. Getting 50 marks means two first rates sunk all by yourself. How about you post a screenshot of your 50 PVP mark victories before you claim this is possible?
  10. It's 9PM EST now, numbers have dropped to 240. Where are your US players? Meanwhile, let me share this random March 2016 screenshot (ie late enough after EA launch that all the random steam people who had no interest in a game with these combat mechanics have already left). 19:58 CET.
  11. That's 950 BR vs 600 BR. Not exactly a relevant scenario for RVR. Where's the other second rate assisting the first rate?
  12. I will now cast the magic spell "jugular" on that Invincible first rate, turning it from a heavily armored tank into a paper ship that takes bonus damage on every hit! And now I will cast the magic spell Thundering Broadside, to prevent the player in the Invincible from casting any defensive spells that will counter the now upcoming instant damage spike that will destroy a completely undamaged ship in the blink of an eye at a distance of 500 yards! Now everyone else casts the magic spell Ultima Ratio Regum, which will make our cannonballs deal twice the actual damage, completely obliterating the DR mechanic that the FLS Devs had spent so much time to fine tune and balance. Oh no, he survived with 1 structure because he did get off the magic spell Last Stand, and that 1 structure is now immune to damage for 75 seconds! Oh no, he cast another magic spell, Invincibility! Now we cannot hit him at all for another 30 seconds as he starts repairing with carpenter, admirals overhaul and emergency repairs! Oh look, it's three minutes later, and his ship is FULLY REPAIRED! What a shit show that game was, lol.
  13. A lot of the issues come from the linear increments of penetration as you go up in shot size. If a 42pd only had 2-3cm more penetration than the 32pd as opposed to the 10cm it actually does have, this whole caste system for ships would disappear fairly quickly. At 250m, a 42pd still has 125 cm of penetration. That's what more than what a 24pd has point blank. An 18pd shot only has 109cm penetration at point blank? What? Given you can have a 100cm armor first rate with the new Naval structure refit, you can have a first rate that is almost *immune* to 18pd long cannons at any range (since you never really have that perfect 90° hit anyways) If any lineship had been immune to guns 18pd and smaller, they would not have fitted so many small guns on these ships in the first place. As I already posted before, that 10cm penetration advantage (on top of the 7cm armor advantage on first rates) is the reason 3rd rates are a non-factor in PBs. I don't know it for certain, but I don't think this is realistic at all on top of the whole thing.
  14. cool, we can go out all ad hominem if you don't actually want to argue with real numbers as the game uses them. What part of "2 kills" did you not understand? Those were mostly Bucentaures. I think I can aim, otherwise I wouldn't have gotten those kill credits. BTW, Captain Reverse also only got 15 PVP marks in that battle, and with 1/5 he was one of the best players on the team. Can you define what a mid sized PVP battle is, please use total BR as the value. Please don't pretend all players can just start to generate enough PVP marks to create first rate fleets. They wouldn't go for 200k a piece if that were even remotely true.