Jump to content
Game-Labs Forum

NethrosDefectus

Ensign
  • Posts

    565
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NethrosDefectus

  1. @admin Now if you could make the large (if not all) forts inactive during open world battles outside of the zones then that would be amazing!
  2. Yes because you've kept Vera Cruz all this time by defending it in port battles.
  3. Ok but bear in mind these are NOT patches notes, they are plans for the first half of 2019, that's a space of SIX MONTHS These will not bring back the players that have left while they wait for a wipe
  4. @admin While all of this looks very exciting and I cannot wait to try it out, there is currently another issue that needs addressing (one that I'm sure could have been avoided by keeping things closer to your chest). At the moment the player numbers are disastrously low, I would be willing to put money on a major cause being the talk of "wipes" far too early in advance. People have just stopped playing because they dont see the point in playing if they are going to lose their ships and warehouse contents down the line at some point (I dont understand the mentality myself but hey ho) They clearly do not understand the concept of buying a game still heavily in development and what is involved that in terms of wipes and resets. Is there anyway you can move things around in such a way that would allow you to do said wipe soon but also allow you to make UI and optimisation changes afterwards. I guess what I am saying could you perhaps consider prioritising the economy and resource changes (I assume that's one of the main reasons for needing/holding off on the wipe) so the wipe can be done and we can get people actually playing the game. At the moment its a loop, player numbers a VERY low and therefor much harder to find a battle at sea, as such people decide they dont want to spend a couple of hours sailing for nothing and just don't log in. That then means less players logging in and it just repeats.
  5. Because you've never used the F11 Bug report to give the exact position of a battle or enemy ships right? Exactly the same principle, I'm sure not everyone knows about that either
  6. Another thing, How is anyone supposed to sell their PvP marks without contracts? It's difficult enough to get PvP to pay for itself as it is. Some of us dont want to grind AI or spend hours making trade runs.
  7. @admin Any idea how long this will be in effect for? It sounds like it will basically ruin the trading for most people.
  8. It's true, he is actually terrible at it, although his single boxing can leave much to be desired at times as well
  9. A tactic particularly effective against the Spanish fleets waiting outside battles as well! 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
  10. Might wanna de-power, perfect angle for leaking there
  11. Admin has already stated this is unacceptable behaviour
  12. We said LANTIA is an alt, a British alt
  13. The British did not have any alts join on the Spanish side, you misunderstood what we said about Lantia. AND who would be stupid enough to openly admit it openly in the battle?
  14. "Lantia" is a British alt of a British player, nothing in the rules to say a player cannot multibox in port battles if both "players" are on the same side. You are proposing that "Lantia" (who doesn't not technically exist) has an alt on the Spanish side in the battle. This is not the case.
  15. Hooray for @Gregory Rainsborough boarding in the last 10 minutes otherwise they would have just timed us out!
  16. You are referring to the La Habanna - Batabano Stargate connection?
  17. So you're saying it took you multiple battles to sink them? So like the Spanish usually do, just keep sending more ships until the enemy is out of repairs?
  18. @Hethwill the Harmless I believe Batman is asking you to close this topic as its purpose has come to an end and has gone WAY off topic
  19. Wait? So the rule is "do not respond to anyone complaining about moderators"? So there is no point in me messaging you at all then. Moderators can behave how they like without consequences? No wonder Gamelabs and the moderators have such a negative image on steam Thanks for your time
  20. You want want me to link you to threads with edited post that have no "edited" tag? Explain the logic in that!

  21. Tried to send @Henry d'Esterre Darby a message as requested by him but received the error "Henry d'Esterre Darby cannot receive messages." Great work as usual
  22. Repeatedly (and I am not the only one who has noticed him doing it) Hethwill has been unable to keep his emotions in check or remain unbiased when perfrom his duties as moderator on the forums. Recently he has become rather aggressive and rude in his replies, sometimes being outright argumentative just to be an arse. He often deletes or edits people's post if their opinions clash with his own. The worst thing about him editing those posts is that he can do it in a way that shows no "edited" tag meaning that he has at times deliberately adjusted posts to how he sees fit and in ways that do not reflect the opinion or sentiment that was originally intended but as far as anyone one the forum is concerned that is what you intended to say when it was in fact not. He has used the same methods to edit his own posts without giving it the "edited" tag so that if proven wrong he has been able to say "that's not what I said though is it" (I have to say admin has been guilty of this at least once that I have noticed a couple of months back) He has a habit of taking a thread off-topic (usually some tangent about coffee or some other crap) and then "verbally" warns others not to do the same. *Now I am fully aware that I am not the politest of people on here and never will be, HOWEVER I am not charged with being a community leader* All in all, @admin if this is what you consider to be a suitable "role model" (can't think of a the actual word I mean) then it is no wonder Naval Action has the playerbase that it does. Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...